Legislation Details

File #: 26-1098    Version: 1 Name:
Type: General Discussion Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 7/27/2026 In control: Town Council
On agenda: 8/13/2026 Final action:
Title: Discussion of relevant factors, such as the ones outlined below, to evaluate whether to separate the Planning & Zoning Commission into two individual commissions or retain the existing combined commission structure. a. Historical reasons for combining the two commissions into one. b. Changes to the Town Charter, local ordinances, etc. c. Financial d. Administrative burden of running two separate meetings and legal notices. e. Application Process-timeline, efficiency, etc. f. Number of volunteers needed-recruiting and retention g. Commission members specialization h. Long term planning and implementation of POCD under the current structure of two separate commissions. i. Consistency between the POCD and zoning decisions. j. Review timeline for zone changes/regulations and amendments. k. Any documented problems due to the combined structure (i.e. diminished planning, conflicts of interest, delayed applications, zoning regulations improperly applied, litigation, etc. l. Feedback from ot...
Attachments: 1. Letter 7-7-26 Proposed Topics - Schroeder, 2. 7-8-26 Executive Summary of Treaster 12-25 Letter, 3. Reasons to Reestablish Separate Zoning and Planning - Treaster, 4. Useful Links, 5. Land Use Budget Analysis 1998-2027, 6. Town Council Public Hearing 06.13.2012, 7. Town of Ledyard Town Council Regular Meeting Minutes 06.27.2012
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

AGENDA REQUEST

GENERAL DISCUSSION ITEM

 

Subject:

title

Discussion of relevant factors, such as the ones outlined below, to evaluate whether to separate the Planning & Zoning Commission into two individual commissions or retain the existing combined commission structure.

a.                     Historical reasons for combining the two commissions into one.

b.                     Changes to the Town Charter, local ordinances, etc.

c.                     Financial

d.                     Administrative burden of running two separate meetings and legal notices.

e.                     Application Process-timeline, efficiency, etc.

f.                     Number of volunteers needed-recruiting and retention

g.                     Commission members specialization

h.                     Long term planning and implementation of POCD under the current structure of two separate commissions.

i.                     Consistency between the POCD and zoning decisions.

j.                     Review timeline for zone changes/regulations and amendments.

k.                     Any documented problems due to the combined structure (i.e. diminished planning, conflicts of interest, delayed applications, zoning regulations improperly applied, litigation, etc.

l.                     Feedback from other towns that have separate commissions and towns that have a combined commission.

m.                     Any other factors not mentioned above.

end

 

 

Background:

(type text here)

 

 

 

Department Comment/Recommendation:

(type text here)