SECONDER: Harwood
Chairman Woody commented he did not think it was necessary to include number D. of
section 6.5.2 Conservation and traffic Mitigation District but is not requesting to remove it
from the proposed changes.
They briefly reviewed proposed changes in Section 8 and concurred they would keep it as
presented. Ms. Burdick stated that she would forward any other necessary changes to the
Commission if she found them.
Ms. Burdick commented on Section 8.1 and stated that there were previous requests from the
Subcommittee to add minimum parking requirements for Accessory Apartments and
Accessory Care Taker Apartments into the draft parking table. She and the Commission
discussed including single family homes and duplexes in the use table. They reviewed
proposed changes to 9.4. “Parking Location and Design Objectives”. They discussed
substituting the word attractive for appropriate. They reviewed the Shared On-Site Parking
amendments and finalized their changes. They discussed reformatting to accommodate
Regulations on Parking Ratios and the use table. They reviewed Section 9.4.3 E., “Off Street
Loading Requirements”, and suggested adding “or as determined by the parking needs
assessment”. Ms. Burdick stated that she would work on some language for this Section to
submit for the text amendment application. The Subcommittee said they could leave it as is
until the application becomes a public hearing.
The Subcommittee reviewed “Reduction in Parking Spaces” They agreed to the proposals for
this section. They agreed to the proposals for “Parking for Buses and other Large Vehicles”.
They reviewed “Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements”. They verified the language
concerning invasive and native species.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT that the formatting of the use table formally contained in 9.1 as
discussed will be included in a tabular format to the full Planning & Zoning Commission
with the numbers as specified by the Subcommittee.
MOVER: Woody
SECONDER: Harwood
The Subcommittee and staff discussed the varying parking requirements related to
restaurants, drive-thru stacking spaces and drive thru restaurants
The Subcommittee and Ms. Burdick began reviewing the draft of the parking requirements
use table. They discussed the dwelling unit and bedroom maximum for accessory apartments
and accessory caretaker apartments. Chairman Woody stated that the requirement should be
one parking space for one bedroom and 2 parking spaces for one or more bedrooms.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT to modify the accessory apartment and accessory commercial
caretaker parking requirements in the draft table to state one (1) parking space for a studio or
one bedroom, and two (2) parking spots for two or more bedrooms.
MOVER: Woody