cost over the proposed threshold dollar amount; the following language was added to
the June 4, 2024 draft; in Section 2. Purpose (paragraph 6):
“When a project involves the purchase of replacement equipment costing more
than $500,000, a waiver to bypass the solicitation of bids for the engagement of an
Owner’s Representative or Consulting Engineer may be approved by the Town
Council; and shall be requested by the Permanent Municipal Building Committee
prior to purchase and installation of the equipment.”
Councilor Dombrowski noted the Police Headquarters Facility Project cost
$6,750,000 (Approved 5/17/2013) and the School(s) Consolidation/Improvement
Project(s) cost $65,835,000 (Approved 1/20/2015); and the School Roof Projects
cost $8,550,000 (Approved 2/22/2022).
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry stated that she was pleased that Mayor Allyn, III, suggested
updating Ordinance #100-015 “An Ordinance Establishing a Permanent Municipal
Building Committee for the Town of Ledyard” because there were a number of items
that the town needed to do to ensure they would receive the State Grant
Reimbursement Funding. She went on to note for the School(s)
Consolidation/Improvement Project(s) (Middle School & Gallup Hill School) there
were several items that were not done properly, and therefore, it was difficult to
obtain the grant funding from the State for those items. She stated having an Owners
Representative, who would be well versed with the state requirements, and other
procedures and process, as well as being physically on-site on a daily basis would
make sense. She stated the volunteer Permanent Municipal Building Committee
(PMBC) was currently meeting once a month, noting it was difficult for them to keep
track. She addressed the School(s) Roof Projects, noting as an example the Projects
were delayed because the town only received two Bids for the Owner Representative,
and the Finance Committee did not grant them a Bid Waiver, so the PMBC had to go
back out to bid which took more time than initially planned.
Councilor Dombrowski explained that part of the reason they were looking to add an
Owners Representative was because there has been some work that was not done as
expected, and it was not discovered until much later in the project. He stated at that
point it became a who said/who said, and they then had to go back to look for the
Change Order, etc. He stated all of these types of things would probably delay the
project and increase the cost. He stated an Owner Representative would increase the
cost of the project, however, he stated the Town would be better suited and covered
to make sure that timelines were followed, problems that arise could be quickly
adjudicated prior to “It happened two-years ago; it is still under warranty, who has
to pay to have the work done properly, etc. ” He stated having an Owners
Representative would mitigate these types of things from happening; or would help
to catch those things earlier, and in the long run would save the town money. He
stated the benefits would outweigh the additional cost of the Owners Representative.
He stated this was his opinion; and that he was hoping to hear others thoughts.
Councilor Brunelle stated her thoughts were along the same lines as Councilor
Dombrowski’s, noting that if it was a project that cost a lot of money, then it was an