741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Planning & Zoning Commission  
Meeting Minutes - Draft Minutes  
Chairman  
J.A. (Tony) Capon  
Thursday, December 8, 2022  
7:00 PM  
Council Chambers - Hybrid Format  
I.  
CALL TO ORDER  
Chairman Capon called the Regular Meeting of the PZC to order at 7:04 PM. The meeting  
was hybrid with some attending in person and others via Zoom.  
II.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
III.  
ROLL CALL APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATES  
Staff present: Juliet Hodge, Director of Planning and Development, John Herring, ZEO,  
Makenna Perry, Land Use Administrative Asst. and Attorney Carl Landolina.  
Commissioner Marcelle Wood  
Chair J.A. (Tony) Capon  
Present  
Alternate Member Thomas Baudro  
Commissioner Paul Whitescarver  
Commissioner Howard Craig  
Commissioner James Awrach  
Alternate Member Gary St. Vil  
Alternate Member Jessica Cobb  
IV.  
CITIZENS PETITIONS (LIMITED TO NON-AGENDA ITEMS)  
Eric Treaster, 10 Huntington Way, opposed to some of the updates to the zoning  
regulations regarding the placement of accessory structures.  
Steve DeLisle, 7 Quail Meadow, concerned about the recent placement of a 40 x 8 x10  
shipping container that was placed in his neighbor's yard. He believes it is too close to his  
fence under current regulations.  
Juliet Hodge explained that storage containers (temporary or permanent) are considered  
"accessory structure" per the regulations and that there are no specific regulations governing  
temporary storage containers or uses. She suggested that the COmmission address this issue.  
V.  
APPROVAL OF ADDITIONS TO AND/OR CHANGES TO ORDER OF THE AGENDA  
None. All attachments and exhibits have been received and made part of the record.  
VI.  
PRE APPLICATION OR WORKSHOP  
None.  
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPLICATIONS  
VIII. OLD BUSINESS  
PZ22-19SUP Application of Daniel Parke, 1591 Rte. 12 Gales Ferry for a Commercial  
Services Home Occupation.  
A.  
Chairman Capon opened the public hearing at 7:17 PM. All regular members were  
seated.  
Daniel Parke, 1591 Route 12, presented his application to operate a small lawn care business  
from his home.  
Juliet Hodge assisted Daniel Parke in presenting his application. She explained that a special  
permit is only required because the particular Home Occupation is for a Commercial Service.  
She referred to the narrative submitted that explained that all activity would occur off site  
and that all equipment would be stored in the existing shed on the property or within the  
enclosed landscaping trailer.There is no signage proposed and no additional employees. All  
vehicles would be shielded from adjacent neighbors and even from the street, though not  
required. She pointed out that the property was located in the GFDD and that there was an  
Auto repair facility and shopping plaza directly across the street. Hodge confirmed that Parke  
must comply with the requirements contained in Section 8.17 of the regulations as well as  
the special permit criteria.  
Commissioner Wood asked about the potential for noise with respect to equipment and  
vehicle maintenance. Mr. Parke explained that any repair work would occur inside the shed  
or his garage as necessary. He explained that he did not anticipate any noise issues.  
Applicant provided proof that abutters had been notified of the hearing.  
Without objection, Chairman Capon closed the public hearing at 7:25 PM.  
Discussion:  
Commission members discussed the application and reviewed the narrative provided to  
demonstrate compliance with the Special Permit Criteria and applicable regulations.  
Commission reviewed the Staff report provided which also evaluated compliance with all  
applicable regulations and criteria.  
The Commission determined that the application as presented satisfied the Special Permit  
Criteria listed in Section 11.3.4 of the Regulations and applicable requirements in Section 8.17.  
Commissioner Wood moved to approve Special Permit Application #PZ22-19SUP to establish  
a Home Occupation - Off-site Commercial Services, accessory to the existing single-family  
residence as permitted by Special Permit in the GFDD.  
By filing the Special Permit and associated Zoning Permit, the applicant certifies that he is a  
domiciled lawful residence of the single-family residence and that he will conduct the home  
occupation in conformance with the “conditions of approval and required conduct” as listed in  
the regulations particularly in Section 8.17.  
Motion passed unanimously.  
The Certificate will contain the following stipulations:  
1. The proposed use shall not create any objectionable noise, odor, vibration, or unsightly  
condition noticeable from any property line  
2. No more than four trips shall be generated per day from the site.  
3. There shall be no more than three vehicles in excess of 26,000 pounds of gross vehicle weight.  
4. All vehicles and equipment shall be stored out of sight from abutting residentially used parcels,  
but may be visible from the street provided that buffering conforms to all property line.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Marcelle Wood  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Howard Craig  
SECONDER:  
Application PZ#22-16SUP of Victor O’Laughlen, 10 Cardinal Lane, Gales Ferry, CT 06335,  
to allow a Short-term Rental use.  
B.  
Chairman Capon opened the public hearing at 7:28 PM.  
Victor O'Laughlen, 10 Cardinal Lane, presented his application for a short-term rental via Zoom. He  
stated that he had been working with the ZEO and Building Department to address the issues raised  
with his application and feels he complies with the requirements.  
The Chairman welcomed public comment.  
The following people spoke:  
Eric Treaster, 7 Huntington Way, spoke against the application. He referenced and email from an  
abutter that described mentioned guest activity at 10 Cardinal Lane as being very disruptive, loud,  
including the use of vulgar language at times. Mr.Treaster stated the taxes for the property were not  
current, but this information was corrected by ZEO and confirmed by the Applicant.  
Mr. Treaster also did not feel the application provided evidence of compliance with Section 8.31.8  
of the regulations concerning guest parking, pet rules, address of owner on property card not  
matching Driver's Lic., and required declaration that owner is the primary resident.  
Carol Miello, 12 Cardinal Lane, a direct abutter, spoke against the application. ZEO Herring asked  
Ms. Miello if she received notice of the public hearing. Ms. Miello stated that neither she or any  
other abutting neighbor she spoke with had received notification. ZEO Herring stated that he sent  
instructions to the applicant via certified mail on how to notify abutters.  
Herring also discussed the various changes on the property card with respect to the number of  
bedrooms, and the lack of proper permits to create the extra bedroom. These issues have been  
resolved, but there is still no evidence of anyone actually living there. He stated that there have been  
written complaints received but found no record that the police had ever been called.  
The Commission discussed the requirement that the host be the owner and that the home be his  
primary residence. Chairman Capon asked Mr. O'Laughlen if his current residence was10 Cardinal  
Lane.  
Mr. O'Laughlen admitted that he was waiting to see what the outcome of the application would be  
and that if approved he intended to live at the property at least 180 days. Staff also mentioned the  
fact that there was a second STR in Ledyard owned by the same LLC and questioned how they both  
could be owner-occupied. O'Laughlen stated that he had a business partner and that between the  
partner and himself someone would live at the properties.  
Chairman Capon asked the Applicant if he notified his abutters in writing as required. Mr.  
O'Laughlen stated that he had misinterpreted the letter he received from the Town and thought that  
the Town would notify the abutters.  
Commissioners asked additional questions about the potentially unsafe bedroom in the basement,  
and about the complaints to date and the plan to ensure that issues do not arise in the future. Mr.  
O'Laughlen stated that he wasn't aware of any additional complaints other than the one complaint  
lodged by the Miellos. He stated he posted a sign in the back yard reminding guests to be quiet when  
outdoors.  
Chairman Capon asked staff and land use Attorney Heller (who was present for another application)  
to explain the flaw of not notifying abutters.  
Eric Treaster, 7 Huntington Way, and Mike Cherry, 5 Whipple Whirl Drive, both reiterated doubts  
they had about whether the applicant resided at the property.  
O'Laughlen concluded with an assurance that he was a good host and has tried to comply with the  
regulations of the town and address the neighbors' concerns.  
Without objection, Chairman Capon closed the Public Hearing at 8:10PM.  
Discussion by the commission.  
Commissioner Wood was concerned about the safety of the renters and/or owner sleeping in the  
basement. Surprised that there was no permit for the STR at all.  
Commissioner Whitescarver concerned about the lack of notification to the abutters and agreed with  
the concerns raised by staff. Feels it should be denied until the application reached the trheshold  
Commissioner Awrach concerned that applicant had been operating the STR without a permit for  
some time now and abutters had not been notified. He felt neighbors had filed complaints and had  
legitimate concerns and that their quality of life needs to be considered.  
Commissioner Craig found the applicant's response to residency and why abutters were not notified  
to be too ambiguous. After reading/hearing complaints, he is not ready to move forward. was the  
lack of letters from the town questionable.  
Commissioner St Vil, felt the applicant meant well, but that the applicant does not comply with the  
regulations. He agreed with the comments raised by the other commission members.  
Commissioner Cobb questioned the intentions of O'Laughlen about his residency.  
After considering all relevant factors, Chairman Capon made a Motion to deny  
Application PZ#16SUP for the following reasons:  
Lack of required notification to abutters making the application incomplete  
Question of residency and ownership  
Continued to operate without a permit  
Disturbances reported by abutters in public hearing.  
Commissioner Marty Wood seconded the motion. Motion Passed unanimously.  
DENIED  
RESULT:  
J.A. (Tony) Capon  
Marcelle Wood  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
Application PZ#22-18SUB of Avery Brook Homes, LLC, 1641 Rte. 12, PO Box 335, Gales  
Ferry, CT 06335, for a 36-Lot subdivision/Affordable Housing Development pursuant to  
section 8-30g of the Connecticut General Statutes, on four parcels of land located at 94, 96,  
98 and100 Stoddards Wharf Rd., Ledyard, CT 06339.  
C.  
Chairman Capon opened the public hearing at 8:25 PM - hearing was continued from  
November 10th, 2022. Regular members present were seated for the public hearing. All  
exhibits listed in the Agenda were incorporated into the record.  
Juliet Hodge listed the additional material that had been submitted after the agenda was  
posted and stated that they would be added to the file.  
Harry Heller, 737 Norwich newlondon Tpke., Uncasville. Stated that the Public hearing just  
opened with the IWWC. They are deciding their course of action with respect to providing  
information requested by the IWWC. Atty. Heller briefly reviewed the changes made to the  
project design to date. He stated that he provided consent to extend the Public hearing to the  
next meeting.  
Motion made by Chairman Capon to continue the Public Hearing to January 12, 2023  
at 7:00PM.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
IX.  
NEW BUSINESS  
Application #PZ22-20RA to revise section 3.9(A) uses subject to a Moratorium, Cannabis  
Establishments; Section 5.4.1 (open space / conservation subdivision) and 7.5 (interior lots).  
A.  
Commission received PZ#22-20RA make minor modifications to sections 3.9(A) uses  
subject to a Moratorium, Cannabis Establishments (to extend the moratorium); Sections  
5.4.1 (open space / conservation subdivision) and 7.5 interior lots).  
Without objection, Chairman Capon set the public hearing for January 12, 2023 at 7:00PM.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Town of Ledyard Affordable Housing Plan  
B.  
Chairman Capon stated that the draft of the Affordable Housing Plan had been sent to the  
Commission members for review. Once the Commission has reviewed it, a public hearing  
will be required to formally approve it. Chairman Capon noted that most of the data used  
was from the ACS 5yr Survey not the 2020 Census data. He would like the consultant to use  
the most recent data especially with respect to population.  
Juliet Hodge explained that the consultant should be invited to a meeting to review the plan  
and discuss the goals.  
Commissioner Cobb asked about what a municipal housing project would entail and whether  
there was town-owned land available for such a project.  
Commissioner members briefly discussed goals and implementation and the involvement of  
other entities in the planning and implementation process.  
Mike Cherry spoke about the relation between the goals of this plan and the housing goals  
stated in the Plan of Conservation and Development. Paul Whitescarver asked about time  
requirements. The plan is definitely past due. Hodge suggested holding a special meeting in  
the end of January to finalize the plan.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
C.  
Informal discussion on STRs  
Commission members had an informal discussion about the future of short term rental  
regulations because of the recent court decision about hosts and owner occupancy.  
Chairman Capon spoke about the continued demand for housing - particularly rental  
housing. Property owners currently have three options: They can have a hosted STRs or rent  
long-term. The question raised was the benefit of allowing non-hosted STRs. Chairman  
Capon asked the Commissioners' input on what the benefit of non-hosted rentals were that  
hosted STRs do not provide. What is the added value?  
Juliet Hodge, asked about whether there was anything that could be added to the regulation  
that would make a non-hosted rental acceptable to the Commission.  
John Herring, spoke of the benefit of being able to downsize into a smaller home (on a  
different property) and rent out the family house as a STR until it could be given to a family  
member in the future.  
Commissioners discussed the difficulties associated with evicting long-term renters and the  
burden placed on neighbors to enforcing the rules of STRs. Mr. Treaster suggested banning  
them all together or imposing a moratorium on STR so that the Commission could work  
through the changes needed to address recent court ruling.  
Thomas Baudro believed that the owners of the STR must be in a position to police their  
properties, not the neighbors. He wanted to be sure that LLHD should weigh in. Staff noted  
that LLHD does not review STR applications.  
Chairman Capon spoke about the fact that STRs reduce the quantity of long-term rental units  
available. This impacts the average price of rent as well,  
Commissioner St.Vil suggested that STRs used by non-residents reduce the tax burden to the  
town - as in STRs do not result in more kids in the school system.  
Mike Cherry stated the Commission needs to clearly define what a short-term rental is and  
spell out the pros and cons of hosted vs non-hosted STRs.  
This was Discussed.  
DISCUSSED  
RESULT:  
X.  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
Draft Minutes November 10, 2022  
Without objection, the minutes of November 10th, 2022 meeting were approved as  
submitted.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
RESULT:  
XI.  
CORRESPONDENCE  
None.  
XII. REPORTS  
Staff Reports  
A.  
Juliet Hodge stated that she finished the sub-division regulations. She asked that the  
commission members review the revised regulations.  
Juliet Hodge presentedJohn Herrings' staff report. She explained that he has been busy with  
blight cases. She also explained that he is retiring at the end of the month.  
DISCUSSED  
XIII EXECUTIVE SESSION  
RESULT:  
Executive Session: Pending Claims and Litigation, Ledyard v Perkins  
A.  
Motion made and seconded to enter into executive session to discuss pending claims and  
litigation, Ledyard v. Perkins at 9:17 PM. All Commission members present and all staff present  
were permitted to attend along with Attorney Landolina.  
Commission exited executive session at 9:42 PM. No votes or actions were taken.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
J.A. (Tony) Capon  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Marcelle Wood  
SECONDER:  
XIV. ADJOURNMENT  
Without objection, Chairman Capon adjourned the meeting at 9:42 PM.  
Meeting Adjourned.  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.