741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Planning & Zoning Commission  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Chairman  
Wood  
Marty  
Regular Meeting  
Thursday, February 13, 2025  
6:00 PM  
Council Chambers - Hybrid Format  
I.  
CALL TO ORDER  
Chairman Wood called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Ledyard Town Hall Annex  
Council Chambers and on Zoom.  
II.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
III.  
ROLL CALL AND APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATES  
Chairman Marcelle Wood  
Present  
Town Council Liaison Howard Craig  
Alternate Member Matthew Miello  
Commissioner Beth E. Ribe  
Alternate Member James Harwood  
Alternate Member Rhonda Spaziani  
Vice Chair Paul Whitescarver  
Excused  
In addition, the following were present:  
Director of Land Use & Planning, Elizabeth Burdick  
Land Use Attorney, Matthew Willis  
Zoning Enforcement Official, Hannah Gienau  
Land Use Assistant, Anna Wynn  
IV.  
V.  
APPROVAL OF ADDITIONS TO AND/OR CHANGES TO THE ORDER OF THE  
AGENDA  
None.  
CITIZENS PETITIONS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS ONLY)  
Kevin Blacker, 11 Church Street, Noank, asked the Commission to consider the potential  
impact of the sewer expansion onto neighboring towns. He stated he is concerned that  
potential effluent will leak into water resources.  
VI.  
PRE APPLICATION DISCUSSION AND/OR WORKSHOP  
None.  
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPLICATIONS  
None.  
VIII. NEW BUSINESS  
PZ#25-1SITE - 740 Colonel Ledyard Highway (Parcel ID: 67-530-740), Ledyard, CT -  
Applicant/Owner, Sal Monarca, Ledyard Center LLC for a Site Plan Review for conversion  
of existing commercial building to 12 residential dwelling units and associated site  
improvements (Submitted 2/10/25, Date of Receipt 2/13/25, DRD 4/18/25).  
A.  
Director Burdick introduced the application and noted that the applicant is attending via  
zoom. She introduced the application to the Commission and gave a brief history of the  
property. She stated that the applicant originally created commercial space with the old  
school building but now wants to develop 55-year-old and older housing.  
The applicant, Norman Tebow, Killingly Engineering Associates, representing Sal Monarca,  
introduced the application and described the information located in the site plan and initial  
building plans for the application. He explained details of the parking plan as it relates to the  
proposed housing units. He explained that next month he will be prepared to give the  
Commission a full presentation.  
Director Burdick stated that the applicant has been working with town staff the last few  
months. Ms. Burdick asked if the Commission had any additional questions at this time.  
MOTION to tabled application PZ#25-1SITE to the PZC Regular Meeting of March 13,  
2025 at 6:00pm in the Town Hall Annex and on zoom.  
TABLED  
RESULT:  
Howard Craig  
Beth E. Ribe  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
EXCUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
IX.  
OLD BUSINESS  
A.  
Discussion & Decision: PZ#24-8SUP & PZ#24-9CAM - 1737 and 1761 Connecticut  
Route 12 (Parcel IDs: 76-2120-1737 & 61-2120-1761), Gales Ferry, CT - Agent, Harry  
Heller, Esq., Heller, Heller & McCoy - Applicant/Owner, Gales Ferry Intermodal, LLC for  
Special Use Permit/Site Plan Approval and Coastal Site Plan Review to modify an existing  
mixed-use (commercial/industrial) development for the addition of an Excavation Operation,  
Major. (Submitted 07/9/24, Date of Receipt 7/11/24, PH must open by 9/13/24, PH set for 9-12-24, PH must  
close by 10-16-24, PH Cont. to 9/26/24, PH Cont. to 10/10/24, PH Cont. to 10/24/24, PH Cont. to 11/14/24,  
PH Cont. to 11/21/24, PH Cont. 12/5/24, PH Cont. to 12/12/24, PH Cont. to 12/19/24, PH closed 12/19/24,  
Tabled to 1/23/25, Tabled to 1/30/25, Tabled to 2/6/25, DRD 2/21/25).  
Staff and the Commission clarified what topics were discussed at the last meeting and which  
they wanted to review at this meeting.  
They decided to discuss Zoning Regulations 7.10. Director Burdick commented that exhibit  
#318 contains many answers to questions they may pose at this evening’s meeting.  
Chairman Wood stated that the Commission would begin the discussion this evening  
reviewing documents related to dust. Commissioner Ribe stated that after reviewing  
Attorney Heller’s responses in exhibit #318 related to dust control she thought the  
Commission should discuss whether the Commission agrees or not that there is sufficient  
dust mitigation.  
Chairman Wood stated that he felt that at the last meeting the Commission had agreed that  
dust would leave the boundaries of the property. Commissioner Harwood commented that he  
felt the applicant did a lot of work to mitigate the dust, but he still feels that dust cannot be  
fully contained to the boundaries of the property.  
Commissioner Ribe commented that she believes the data from the Verdantas study uses a  
three-year average, which she felt was not accurate for the scope of the application.  
Commissioner Harwood commented that he feels the increase in truck traffic from the site  
should be included in potential pollution impacts. The Commission discussed the ways in  
which they feel truck traffic could cause more pollution to the surrounding area. Chairman  
Wood specifically pointed out Juliet Long Elementary School. Chairman Wood asked the  
other Commissioners if they would agree that the Zoning Regulations that deal with dust  
containment are not met. The Commission concurred.  
Chairman Wood introduced the conversation of sound related to the application and  
specifically mentioned the L10 and L90 values shown in the reports. Staff and the  
Commission reviewed exhibit #318 and HMMH’s peer review. Director Burdick read them  
into the record for the Commission. The Commission reviewed the data contained in these  
reports.  
Chairman Wood asked if the Commission had any thoughts on sound generation from  
blasting. He commented on documents submitted by Sauls Seismic and read exhibit #94 into  
the record. He asked for input from the Commission regarding the exhibit he read into the  
record. Commissioner Miello commented that his main concern regarding blasting is the  
impact on nearby residencies. They discussed the first phase of the project having 3-4 blasts  
a week at the first half and then down to one blast a week during the second half of the  
phase. Chairman Wood asked if the Commission has concerns about negative impact to  
historical homes.  
Commissioner Harwood stated that he feels that initial blasting at the beginning of the  
project isn’t likely to impact homes, but that when they begin blasting further down the  
mountain, he feels that vibration will travel more directly into the surrounding home  
structures.  
Commissioner Craig commented on Zoning Regulation 9.2.c and stated that he is concerned  
that the application does not meet the requirements of this regulation. He and the  
Commission clarified that they feel that vibration will leave the boundaries of the site.  
Commissioner Ribe commented that she feels exhibit #94 and #139 confirm that there is a  
possibility of vibration leaving the site.  
Chairman Wood introduced the conversation of silica. Director Burdick commented that in  
exhibit #318 it talks about silica dust. She read the response into the record. She commented  
that the Verdantas report that was submitted by the applicant was part of the Zoning  
Compliance Manual and read several pieces of its data located in the responses from the  
applicant in exhibit #318. Director Burdick stated that HMMH, who performed the  
third-party review, also submitted several documents on this matter.  
Commissioner Ribe commented that her main concern is any dust leaving the boundaries of  
the site on trucks or by other means. Commissioner Harwood commented that his concern is  
that blasted silica particles are sharp and can cause significant lung damage. Commissioner  
Miello commented on the geology reports submitted by Geotech and stated his concerns  
about the rock composition containing silica. The Commission discussed what protective  
gear the workers would be wearing during the operation. Attorney Willis commented that the  
kind of gear workers would be wearing can be found in exhibit #318. Chairman Wood and  
Commissioner Miello discussed the breakdown of potential emitters according to the  
Verdantas. Commissioner Harwood commented that potential weather changes like dry  
weather and wind could contribute to dust leaving the boundaries of the site.  
Chairman Wood opened the conversation of radon up to the Commission. Commissioner  
Ribe stated that she did not feel concerned about impacts of radon due to the scope of the  
project being so much open space. The rest of the Commission concurred.  
Director Burdick commented that DEEP weighed into the conversation of radon and read  
their response into the record. She stated that DEEP had recommended test for nearby  
residencies. Commissioner Miello asked whose responsibility it would be to put in radon  
remediation systems if radon became an issue from blasting. Commissioner Harwood asked  
if radon being released is a long or short term to nearby homes. Director Burdick read  
DEEP’s recommendation for testing into the record marked as exhibit #326. The  
Commission and staff discussed testing procedures per DEEP’s recommendation. Director  
Burdick read exhibit #132 into the record. Commissioner Miello commented on the  
monitoring system. He stated that if the application were to be approved, they would want to  
condition additional monitoring systems in vulnerable areas surrounding the properties such  
as Juliet Long. Commissioner Harwood commented that he was not clear about the impact of  
radon on the aquifer. They discussed potential impacts.  
Chairman Wood stated that he would like to review 7.10 of the Ledyard Zoning Regulations  
on page 7-16. Director Burdick commented that the regulation is also contained in exhibit  
#318 where the applicant had already answered Commissioner questions concerning  
regulation 7.10. She read Zoning Regulation 7.16 into the record and commented that if rock  
crushing wasn’t anticipated or allowed, why would the regulation say the Commission could  
limit it. She also stated that the Commission would have to decide the meaning of temporary.  
She referenced past projects and applications that included rock crushing as part of the  
operation. Commissioner Harwood read zoning regulation 7.10.1a and asked if they would  
have to renew the permit every 6 months. Director Burdick stated she also has some  
questions about the regulations as many parts of the regulations contradict each other. Staff  
and the Commission concluded that Zoning Regulation 7.10 was not intended for excavation  
major applications and more so intended for smaller projects like single family home  
constructions.  
The Commission tried to define the difference between rock crushing and processing.  
Director Burdick read pertinent Zoning Regulations into the record. Staff and the  
Commission discussed what processing verse rock crushing means. Director Burdick  
commented again that the Commission has the authority to limit rock crushing according to  
their regulations.  
Chairman Wood asked if the Commission feels that Zoning Regulation 7.10 is not relevant  
to the application. The Commissioner continued to discuss the issue of whether the  
regulation is applicable to the application.  
Chairman Wood commented again that the intent of the application is to develop buildable  
land and that rock crushing would be a necessary operation to complete that task. He  
commented that the Commission should review the Planning Staff Report that was received  
at the PZC Special Meeting of January 30, 2025. Staff and the Commission confirmed that  
the Commission still had to review section f on pg 6.  
Attorney Willis and the Commission discussed the process of deciding on an application  
with an intervenor.  
Chairman Wood commented that he is struggling understanding the meaning of resource  
related to 22.18. Attorney Willis commented that a good rule of thumb is do you have those  
same questions or concerns with other subdivision applications etc. The Commission  
discussed what would necessitate resources or concerns for wildlife. Director Burdick  
commented that exhibits #137-1, #137-2, #137-3, #137-4 and regard information from the  
National Diversity Data Base that speak to wildlife.  
Chairman Wood asked if the Commission is concerned about the 3-1 slope proposed in the  
application. Commissioner Miello stated that 3-1 slope is intended for loose materials not  
solid rock. He explained that it is intended to help erosion control by letting loose material  
breath, the slope change has little difference on solid granite. The Commission concurred  
that they do not have any concerns with the proposed benching.  
The Commission discussed where the fueling station for machinery would be located. They  
reviewed the site plans for the project. Attorney Willis commented that information is  
displayed on Sheet C-13. The Commission and staff reviewed the data on the site plan for  
the fueling station. Chairman Wood and the Commission clarified that there were generators  
and not the electric company that powered the machinery.  
Commissioner Harwood expressed his concerns for tree stabilization on the proposed  
benching. Director Burdick commented that information about this is found on Sheet C-12.  
The Commissioner discussed the size and types of trees proposed to be planted on the  
benching. They discussed the stabilization of the trees. Director Burdick commented that tree  
planting is not required for this kind of operation but that the applicant is planting trees for  
aesthetic purposes.  
Chairman Wood commented that according to the regulations the completed project cannot  
be an eyesore. Commissioner Ribe asked if the Commission needed to discuss the POCD.  
Commissioner Ribe would like to discuss if the application is in accordance with the POCD  
and if are there any alternative plans that would allow them to develop the land.  
Chairman Wood commented on the remediated parts of the parcel. Commissioner Ribe  
commented that the parcel is industrially zoned. The discussed the remediation process and  
Director Burdick commented again that remediation is under the jurisdiction of DEEP. She  
read from the POCD, section 7, pg 37.  
Staff and the Commission continued to discuss how they would determine when one phase  
ends and another begins. Chairman Wood clarified that his concern is that the Ledyard  
Zoning Regulations do not allow for more than 10 acers at a time to be processed. The  
Commission discussed and stated that the plan does not indicate that the phases would  
overlap in a way that would exceed the acreage limit.  
Chairman Wood asked if staff would be able to state that the applicant would not exceed  
those limits. Director Burdick stated that yes with the appropriate conditions and spoke to the  
process of monitoring and tracking the project.  
Commissioner Harwood and staff discussed how they would determine the end and  
beginning of phase 2 and 3. Director Burdick explained the process that would occur in the  
Land Use Department.  
Attorney Willis commented that he will draft a motion to approve and a motion to deny and  
that within the week he will get that to the land use office. The Commission and Attorney  
Willis commented that the drafted motions can be discussed and modified as needed at the  
next meeting. They discussed the process of drafting or amending the motion at the next  
meeting.  
MOTION to table application PZ#24-8SUP & PZ#24-9CAM to the PZC Special Meeting of  
February 20, 2025, in the Town Hall Annex and on Zoom.  
TABLED  
RESULT:  
Beth E. Ribe  
Howard Craig  
MOVER:  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
RECUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
X.  
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS  
MOTION to approve PZC Regular Meeting Minutes of January 9, 2025  
A.  
Chairman Wood made a MOTION to approve the PZC Regular Meeting Minutes of January  
9, 2025. This motion was moved by Commissioner Ribe and seconded by Commissioner  
Craig.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
RESULT:  
Beth E. Ribe  
MOVER:  
Howard Craig  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
RECUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
MOTION to approved PZC Special Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2025  
B.  
C.  
D.  
Chairman Wood made a MOTION to approve the PZC Special Meeting Minutes of January  
23, 2025. This motion was moved by Commissioner Miello and seconded by Commissioner  
Harwood.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Marcelle Wood  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
James Harwood  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
RECUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
MOTION to approve PZC Special Meeting Minutes of January 30, 2025  
Chairman Wood made a MOTION to approve the PZC Special Meeting Minutes of January  
30, 2025. This motion was moved by Commissioner Ribe and seconded by Commissioner  
Craig.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Beth E. Ribe  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Howard Craig  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
RECUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
MOTION to approve PZC Special Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2025  
Chairman Wood made a MOTION to approve the PZC Special Meeting Minutes of February  
6, 2025. This motion was moved by Commissioner Ribe and seconded by Commissioner  
Craig.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Beth E. Ribe  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Howard Craig  
SECONDER:  
5
1
1
Wood, Craig, Miello, Ribe, and Harwood  
AYE:  
Whitescarver  
Spaziani  
RECUSED:  
NON-VOTING  
XI.  
CORRESPONDENCE  
None.  
XII. REPORTS  
Staff Reports  
A.  
Zoning Enforcement Official, Hannah Gienau, presented her staff report that was included in  
the Commissioners’ folders. Director Burdick commented on the bond release process.  
Commissioner Craig and Ms. Gienau clarified the nature of the violations in her report. The  
Commission and staff discussed zoning violations regarding RVs and living dwellings.  
Commissioner Craig and staff clarified what defines a permanent residence in the Zoning  
Regulations on page 2-15. Staff and the Commission discussed the violation process.  
XIII. ADJOURNMENT  
Commissioner Ribe moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded  
by Commissioner Harwood  
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.  
VOTE: 5-0 Approved and so declared  
Respectively Submitted,  
_______________________________  
Sectary Howard Craig  
Planning & Zoning Commission  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.