741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, CT 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Administration Committee  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman Gary St. Vil  
Special Meeting  
Wednesday, August 6, 2025  
6:00 PM  
Town Hall Annex- Hybrid Format  
In -Person: Council Chambers, Town Hall Annex Building  
Remote Participation Information Noted Below:  
Join Zoom Meeting from your Computer, Smart Phone or Tablet:  
Or by Audio Only: Telephone: +1 646 558 8656; Meeting ID: 847 2536 1090; Passcode:  
750730  
I
CALL TO ORDER  
the Meeting was called to order by Councilor Buhle at 6:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers  
Town Hall Annex Building.  
Councilor Buhle welcomed all to the Hybrid Meeting. She stated for the Town Council  
Administration Committee and members of the Public who were participating via video  
conference that the remote meeting information was available on the Agenda that was  
posted on the Town’s Website - Granicus-Legistar Meeting Portal.  
II.  
ROLL CALL  
Kevin Dombrowski  
Jessica Buhle  
Present:  
April Brunelle  
In addition the following were present:  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry  
Mayor Fred Allyn, III  
Mr. Milton (Dave) Schroeder, Jr.  
Mr. Edwin Murray  
Ms. Eleanor Murray  
Ms. Deborah Edwards  
Administrative Assistant Roxanne Maher  
III.  
RESIDENTS & PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS  
Mr. Milton Dave Schroeder, Jr., 290 Whalehead Road, Gales Ferry, stated before he  
begins his comments that he wanted to be clear that his comments were not intended  
as a personal critique of the Town Attorney, noting that he appreciated the time and  
expertise he has contributed in editing the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics  
and Establishing an Ethics Commission. He stated the Town Attorney’s insights are  
clearly thoughtful, grounded in legal reasoning, noting he recognized that he was  
speaking without the benefit of having heard the Town Attorney’s full explanation  
for the revisions that have been made.  
Mr. Schroeder went on to state in the interest of keeping this discussion focused on  
the content rather than individuals, that he would refer to the proposed revisions  
simply as "the attorney edits" or "the edits."  
Mr. Schroeder continued by stating as someone who was not legally trained, that  
he understands that some of these edits may be intended to streamline the  
language, removing redundant definitions or simplifying structure. He noted where  
that was the case, that he fully supported those changes. Clarity and simplicity  
serve everyone. However, he noted that there were other edits that he found more  
difficult to understand, and, in some cases, entire sections of the draft have been  
eliminated. He stated that he worried that these edits may substantially alter the  
intent or effectiveness of the Ethics Code itself.  
Mr. Schroeder questioned whether the State provided a model template or example  
language to help municipalities establish effective codes of ethics and ethics  
commissions? He stated after more than a year of effort, it's worth asking: “Have we  
simply recreated what already existed, or have we truly improved upon it?” He also  
questioned whether it was really this challenging to arrive at a workable Ethics Code  
with clear enforcement mechanisms, and he questioned whether they have even  
managed to do that? He stated that it would be helpful to understand how this edited  
draft compares to those already adopted by neighboring towns; many of which have  
relied on more standardized, broadly accepted language.  
Mr. Schroeder stated given the time and energy invested in this process, one would  
hope this Committee has produced a document that not only reflected the best  
practices, but sets a high standard. Otherwise, he stated that they risk ending up with  
a code that appears substantial but ultimately lacks the scope, authority, and the  
enforceability needed to be truly effective; and if was not effective, that perhaps the  
town would have been better served with the model template(s) and generic  
language.  
Mr. Schroeder stated that he had about 1 ½ pages of comments regarding specific  
sections of the draft Ordinance. Councilor Buhle thanked Mr. Schroeder for his  
comments noting that the Town Council had a Special Meeting scheduled for 6:30  
p.m. this evening. Therefore, she asked in the interest of time, that Mr. Schroeder  
leave his 1 ½ pages of comments regarding specific sections of the draft Ordinance  
with her this evening for the Administration Committee to review as part of their  
deliberation. She stated the Mr. Schroeder’s comments would be attached to the  
meeting portal.  
Mr. Edwin Murray, 26 Devonshire Drive, Gales Ferry, stated after reviewing the  
seventeen pages of the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and Establishing  
an Ethics Commission he realized that the Town Attorney made the document more  
concise. He stated that the proposed Ordnance provides a framework that the town  
can work from. He stated the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and  
Establishing an Ethics Commission, as edited by the Town Attorney, should be  
voted on and approved.  
Mr. Murray continued by noting the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and  
Establishing an Ethics Commission included all the town officials and employees,  
however, it does not include the management staff of the schools. He stated that he  
thought the draft Ordinance worked for the town and provided them with the  
opportunity for the town to move forward with the proposal.  
Ms. Deborah Edwards, 30 Bluff Road - West, Gales Ferry, stated that she echoed  
Mr. Schroeder’s comments this evening. She stated that she believed the Town  
Attorney’s comments regarding the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and  
Establishing an Ethics Commission helped to clarify the document and made it more  
concise. However, she stated the Town Attorney’s rewrite of the document left out  
some things that she thought were important; and were things that they were all  
looking to include in the proposed Ordinance. She noted that Councilor Buhle  
mentioned that she had a telephone conversation with the Town Attorney regarding  
the proposal; and that she looked forward to Councilor Buhle relaying the reason for  
the Town Attorney’s edits page-by-page and hearing the Administration Committee’s  
discussion regarding the Town Attorney’s edits. She stated until all this was  
accomplished she would urge the Administration Committee not to move forward  
with the draft Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and Establishing an Ethics  
Commission.  
Ms. Edwards requested clarification on the process for the Town Council to adopt an  
Ordinance, noting that it was her understanding that after the Administration  
Committee forwards a proposed Ordinance to the Town Council that a Public  
Hearing would be held before the Town Council would vote on the proposed  
Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and Establishing an Ethics Commission.  
Councilor Buhle stated that Ms. Edward’s understanding was correct, in that a Public  
Hearing would be held prior to the Town Council’s deliberation and vote on the  
proposed Ordinance Creating a Code of Ethics and Establishing an Ethics  
Commission.  
Councilor Buhle thanked the residents for their comments.  
IV.  
PRESENTATIONS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS  
None.  
V.  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
MOTION to approve the Administration Committee Minutes of July 9, 2025  
Moved by Councilor Dombrowski, seconded by Councilor Brunelle  
VOTE: 3 - 0 Approved and so declared  
Kevin Dombrowski  
MOVER:  
April Brunelle  
SECONDER:  
VI.  
OLD BUSINESS  
Discussion and possible action to create an Ethics Commission for the Town of Ledyard.  
1.  
Councilor Buhle stated after the Administration Committee’s June 11, 2025 meeting  
the draft “Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics and Ethics Commission for the  
Town of Ledyard” was sent to Town Attorney Matt Ritter for his review. She stated  
that she and Attorney Ritter spoke by telephone on June 26, 2025 for thirty minutes  
about the draft Ordinance. She stated there were about seven changes that were  
discussed to provide clarity, such as increasing the gift amount from $25.00 to  
$100.00. She stated there were also some sections of the draft Ordinance that were  
removed that Attorney Ritter asked her about, noting that during their conversations  
they had agreed to keep, however, she stated that some of those sections were  
removed in the draft Ordinance that Attorney Ritter sent back, even though Attorney  
Ritter agreed that they were legal and permissible.  
Councilor Buhle continued by stating that Councilor Garcia-Irizarry put in a lot of  
work and effort to draft the proposed “Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics and  
Ethics Commission for the Town of Ledyard” noting that the removed sections were  
being used in other towns Ethics Ordinances. She also noted that prior to submitting  
the draft Ordinance to Attorney Ritter that both she and Councilor Dombrowski  
provided some changes to the original framework that Councilor Garcia-Irizarry  
drafted. She stated that she felt that the Administration Committee had a strong  
working document, noting that she expected Attorney Ritter to make some changes.  
However, she stated the draft Ordinance Attorney Ritter returned to the  
Administration Committee did not fall in-line with her expectations of what she  
thought was going to get back.  
Councilor Buhle noted that she has emailed Attorney Ritter stating that she had  
some concerns regarding the edited document she received from him because it did  
not match up with their telephone conversation they had regarding the draft  
Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics and Ethics Commission for the Town of  
Ledyard”. She stated that she strongly wanted to make sure they accomplish the goal  
to establish a Code of Ethics and Ethics Commission to protect the town in the future  
and to make sure they establish something that protected them going forward. She  
stated that she did not want “perfect” to get in the way of “good”; but that she did  
not want to adopt something that was not what the residents were looking for, noting  
that the Administration Committee agreed that they had a good starting draft  
Ordinance, and that she expected to receive some changes back from the Attorney  
Ritter.  
Councilor Buhle stated that the Administration Committee would not be acting on  
the draft Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics and Ethics Commission for the  
Town of Ledyard” provided by Attorney Ritter this evening because she wanted the  
Committee to take some time to review Attorney Ritter’s recommendations to decide  
which recommendations they wanted to abide; by and which sections they would like  
to see in the final draft.  
Councilor Dombrowski stated that he agreed with Councilor Buhle’s  
recommendation to take some time to review Attorney Ritter’s recommendations,  
noting that 50% of the document was deleted; and the remaining 50% was reworded.  
Councilor Dombrowski noted the document Mr. Schroeder provided to the  
Administration Committee this evening. He specifically addressed Mr. Schroeder’s  
comment regarding the following:  
“Comment on Section 5 - Conflict of Interest Provisions:  
Thank you for the clarification between officials and employees-that's a  
helpful improvement.  
However, I'm concerned about the removal of the original language in  
Subsection 5.1 that prohibited any interest-direct or indirect-that could  
compromise a person's independent judgment. This language addressed a  
broad spectrum of ethical concerns, including non-financial conflicts of  
interest, and provided a vital safeguard for maintaining public trust.  
By narrowing the focus only to financial interests in contracts or purchases,  
the revised language may unintentionally weaken the scope of the ethics code.  
Ethical conflicts don't always come down to money-they can involve personal  
relationships, affiliations, or outside obligations that impair objectivity.  
I would recommend reinstating or adapting the original "independent judgment"  
clause to preserve its broader intent, while still benefiting from the added clarity  
and structure introduced in the new draft.  
Subsection 5.3 "Personal beneficial interest" and "directly or indirectly" have  
been removed. These terms were important for covering non-obvious or indirect  
benefits (like a benefit to a friend, business associate, or shell company), not just  
direct financial gain. Their removal could narrow the definition of a conflict.”  
Councilor Dombrowski explained the Connecticut General Statutes that enables  
Municipalities to establish an Ethics Commission only allowed Ethics  
Commissions to address financial matters, noting that an Ethics Commission  
cannot look at anything else. He stated someone cannot file an Ethics Complaint  
because they disagreed with a Town Official’s decision on something. He stated  
that he wanted to provide this clarification because he was not sure what residents  
were expecting the Ethics Commission to look at. He stated the State Statute was  
specific to personal financial gains while they were representing the town such  
as: embezzlement from the town, working on contracts that were self-imposed  
where they were the recipient of; and they was the person approving the  
contracts.  
Councilor Buhle stated that the Administration Committee would continue their  
work to draft an Ordinance that would protect the town and its residents; and  
would also fall in line with Connecticut General State Statutes.  
Councilor Brunelle stated that it would be wise to sit back and take in Attorney  
Ritter’s suggestions and weigh them against whether it was what the  
Administration Committee wanted versus whether it was fluff or really necessary.  
She stated that she would like more time to go through Attorney Ritter’s  
recommendation.  
Councilor Buhle suggested the Administration Committee review and compare the  
draft Ordinance they forward to Attorney Ritter to the mark-up draft they received  
back from Attorney Ritter. She asked that the Committee forward their comments  
and recommendations to the Administrative Assistant Roxanne Maher to compile  
for a discussion at a Special Meeting specially dedicated to work on the  
Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics and Ethics Commission for the Town of  
Ledyard”.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
VII. NEW BUSINESS  
MOTION to reappoint the following members the Agricultural Commission for a three (3)  
1.  
year term ending September 24, 2028:  
·
·
·
Ms. Allyson Angelini (U) 193 Iron Street, Ledyard (Regular Member)  
Ms. Katie Yuhas (U) 34 Meetinghouse Lane, Gales, Ferry (Regular Member)  
Mr. Steve Martic (R) 59R-2 Long Pond South, Ledyard (Alternate Member)  
Moved by Councilor Brunelle, seconded by Councilor Dombrowski  
Discussion: None  
VOTE: 3 - 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
April Brunelle  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Kevin Dombrowski  
SECONDER:  
3
Dombrowski, Buhle and Brunelle  
AYE:  
MOTION to appoint Ms. Jennifer Bingham (D) 826 West Drive, Gales Ferry, as an Alternate  
Member to the Board of Assessment Appeals to complete a four (4) year term ending August  
26, 2028 to fill a vacancy left by Mr. Nelson.  
2.  
Moved by Councilor Dombrowski, seconded by Councilor Brunelle  
Discussion: None  
VOTE: 3 - 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Kevin Dombrowski  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
April Brunelle  
SECONDER:  
3
Dombrowski, Buhle and Brunelle  
AYE:  
MOTION to appoint Mr. Greg Lockhart (D) 30 Tanger Lane, Gales Ferry, to the Planning &  
Zoning Commission, as an Alternate Member to complete a three (3) year term ending  
December 31, 2025 to fill a vacancy left by Mr. Harwood.  
3.  
Moved by Councilor Brunelle, seconded by Councilor Dombrowski  
Discussion: None  
VOTE: 3 - 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
April Brunelle  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Kevin Dombrowski  
SECONDER:  
3
Dombrowski, Buhle and Brunelle  
AYE:  
IV  
ADJOURNMENT  
Councilor Dombrowski moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Councilor  
Brunelle.  
VOTE:  
3 - 0 Approved and so declared, the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.  
Respectfully submitted,  
Jessica Buhle  
Committee Chairman  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.