Application PZ#22-7RA of the Ledyard Planning and Zoning Commission, to consider
comprehensive revisions to all sections of the Zoning Regulations.
A.
Mr. Capon reviewed the process to date to revise the Regulations and efforts to solicit opinions
and public input.
Public Hearing opened at 6:18pm
Juliet Hodge went over the major changes outlined in the document she submitted.
The following people spoke:
Karen Parkinson, 55 Rose Hill Rd., Ledyard read her comments into the record. Ledyard is no
longer a bedroom community with little else to draw people in. There have been many welcome
improvements in commercial areas and many community groups have been forming. Ledyard
now has a sense of Community. How do we continue to focus on connectivity. Suggested
requiring a trail system around any new development and have pathways from residential uses in
the town center areas to commercial areas. Supports accessory apartments.
Mark Thackson, 18Tanager Lane, Concerned about the rise of non-hosted Airbnbs.
Earl Tyson-Lamb, 95 Lambtown Rd. representing the Historic Commission, and the voice of the
older families in Ledyard. Pointed out that there were a lot of family homesteads on shared
driveways . Feels there should be less restrictions, not more. Supports supporting farming -
doesn't like acreage requirements.
Deborah Schwell, 1707 Center Groton Rd. stated that it was the High School and existing
Zoning Regulations at the time that attracted her to Ledyard. She liked that they were very
minimal.
Eric Treaster, 10 Huntington Way, presented his comments on chapters 1-6. Mr. Treaster is
against allowing accessory structures and Accessory Apartments in the front yard of a property.
He is opposed to the proposed increase in building height for Multi-family developments. He
urged the Commission to put language back in for Land-leased Communities.
Mike Cherry, 5 Whippoorwill Dr., commented on the proposed changes and clarified the initial
objectives for making the changes. Wanted to fix the inconsistencies caused by several past
disjointed regulation changes. Some issues need to be addressed in the POCD as well. Spoke in
favor of the proposed changes and thanked the Commission for their efforts.
Commission members asked questions of staff and Attorney Fahey throughout the hearing.
No further public comments. Mr. Capon asked Attorney Fahey and staff about the process of
incorporating comments received and changes. Attorney Fahey cautioned that the changes
cannot be made to things that were not reasonably connected to the original document which was
noticed. Nothing new can be introduced during deliberations.
MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:39pm made by Commissioner Whitescarver and
seconded by Commissioner Baudro. Motion Passed Unanimously.
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED
Paul Whitescarver
RESULT:
MOVER:
Thomas Baudro
SECONDER:
VI.
A.
OLD BUSINESS
Discussion and Possible Vote on Application #PZ22-7RA Comprehensive re-write of the Zoning