741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339-1551  
(860) 464-3203  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Town Council  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman S. Naomi  
Rodriguez  
Sp. Town Council Mtg Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget  
5:30 PM Town Hall Council Chambers  
Tuesday, May 27, 2025  
In-Person: Council Chambers Town Hall Annex  
Remote: Information noted below:  
Join Zoom Meeting from your Computer, Smart Phone or Tablet:  
Audio Only: Telephone: +1 646 558 8656; Meeting ID: 869 6829 7481; Passcode: 430700  
I.  
CALL TO ORDER  
Chairman Rodriguez called the special meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. at the Council Chambers,  
Town Hall Annex Building.  
Chairman Rodriguez welcomed all to the Hybrid Meeting. She stated for the members of  
the Town Council and the Public who were participating via video conference that the  
remote meeting information was available on the Agenda that was posted on the Town’s  
Website - Granicus-Legistar Meeting Portal.  
II.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
ROLL CALL  
III.  
Councilor William Barnes  
Councilor April Brunelle  
Councilor Jessica Buhle  
Present:  
Councilor Kevin Dombrowski  
Councilor Carmen Garcia-Irizarry  
Chairperson S. Naomi Rodriguez  
Councilor Tim Ryan  
Councilor Tony Saccone  
Councilor Gary St. Vil  
IV.  
BUSINESS OF THE MEETING  
Finance Committee  
MOTION to grant a Bid Waiver to Building One Facility Services, LLC, of Durham,  
Connecticut, due to receiving fewer than the required three bids in response to Bid #2025-09  
(Janitorial Services), in accordance with Ordinance #200-07 (rev 1) “An Ordinance for  
Purchasing”  
1.  
Moved by Councilor Ryan, seconded by Councilor Buhle  
Discussion: Mayor Allyn, III, stated in response to Bid #2025-09 (Janitorial Services for the Town  
Hall Annex Building and the Police Department) that only two bids were received; therefore, a bid  
waiver was being requested. He explained in addition to a new Janitorial Vendor that as a  
cost-cutting measure the new contract would only lean the Town Hall and the Annex Building once  
a week; and they would clean the Police Department five days per week, noting that they have three  
shifts that operate 24/7. He stated that the Town Hall Staff would take out their trash, noting that this  
was another step for a lean operation at Town Hall. He stated the new Janitorial Services Contract  
was for four-years and would be a savings of $8,900 per year.  
VOTE: 9 - 0 Approved and so declared  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Jessica Buhle  
SECONDER:  
9
Barnes, Brunelle, Buhle, Dombrowski, Garcia-Irizarry, Rodriguez, Ryan,  
Saccone, and St. Vil  
AYE:  
MOTION to waive the reading in its entirety the “Town Council Resolutions Approving Bond  
Resolutions And Calling Town Meeting” to be held on Monday, June 23, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in  
the Council Chambers, 741 Colonel Ledyard Highway, Ledyard to consider said Resolution; and  
adjourn to a vote at a referendum to be held on Tuesday, July 8, 2025 between the hours of  
12:00 Noon and 8:00 p.m. at the Town Hall, Lower Level - Registrar’s Office, 741 Colonel  
Ledyard Highway.  
2.  
Moved by Councilor Buhle, seconded by Councilor Ryan  
Discussion: None.  
VOTE: 9 - 0 Approved and so declared  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Jessica Buhle  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tim Ryan  
SECONDER:  
9
Barnes, Brunelle, Buhle, Dombrowski, Garcia-Irizarry, Rodriguez, Ryan,  
Saccone, and St. Vil  
AYE:  
MOTION to approve the “Town Council Resolutions Approving Bond Resolutions And Calling  
Town Meeting to be held on Monday, June 23 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers,  
741 Colonel Ledyard Highway, Ledyard to consider said Resolution; and adjourn to a vote at a  
referendum to be held on Tuesday, July 8, 2025 between the hours of 12:00 Noon and 8:00  
p.m. at the Town Hall, Lower Level - Registrar’s Office, 741 Colonel Ledyard Highway.  
3.  
Res: 003/2025/  
DRAFT  
TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS  
APPROVING BOND RESOLUTIONS AND  
CALLING TOWN MEETING  
RESOLVED,  
That the resolution entitled “RESOLUTION AMENDING THE RESOLUTION  
ENTITLED “RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $8,550,000 FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL  
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS AND  
NOTES IN THE SAME AMOUNT TO FINANCE SAID APPROPRIATION” TO  
INCREASE THE APPROPRIATION AND BORROWING AUTHORIZATION TO  
$9,800,000” is hereby approved and a copy of said resolution shall be attached to and incorporated  
into these minutes.  
FURTHER RESOLVED,  
That the Ledyard Town Council recommends that a town meeting, adjourned to referendum,  
adopt the above resolution entitled “RESOLUTION AMENDING THE RESOLUTION  
ENTITLED “RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $8,550,000 FOR VARIOUS SCHOOL  
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS AND NOTES  
IN THE SAME AMOUNT TO FINANCE SAID APPROPRIATION” TO INCREASE THE  
APPROPRIATION AND BORROWING AUTHORIZATION TO $9,800,000” in accordance with  
Chapter VII, Sections 7 and 12 of the Town Charter.  
FURTHER RESOLVED,  
That the Chairman of the Town Council is authorized to call a hybrid (In-Person & Video Con  
Zoom <https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88245336277?pwd=dsL5439nviyhuTta0qRkyP6MrXZL3D.1>; or by a  
only telephone 1-646- 558-8656; Meeting ID: 882 4533 6277; Passcode: 558287; Special Town Meeting  
held on Monday, June 23, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 741 Colonel Ledyard Highway,  
Town of Ledyard to consider said Resolution.  
FURTHER RESOLVED,  
That the Town Council, pursuant to Section 14 of Chapter III and Section 9 of Chapter VII of the  
Town Charter, hereby designates for submission to the voters at referendum to be held on Tuesday, July  
8, 2025 between the hours of 12:00 Noon and 8:00 p.m. at the Town Hall, Lower Level - Registrar’s  
Office, 741 Colonel Ledyard Highway in the Town of Ledyard, in the manner provided by said Sections,  
action on the aforesaid Resolution to be presented to said Special Town Meeting, and directs the Town  
Clerk to give notice of such referendum vote.  
FURTHER RESOLVED,  
That the Chairman of the Town Council cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said Special  
Town Meeting and Referendum to be posted and published in accordance with the provisions of the Town  
Charter.  
FURTHER RESOLVED,  
That the aforesaid Resolution shall be placed upon the ballot under the following heading:  
“SHALL THE TOWN OF LEDYARD APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL  
$1,250,000 (INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION AND BORROWING  
AUTHORIZATION TO AN AGGREGATE $9,800,000) FOR VARIOUS  
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE  
ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND NOTES IN THE SAME AMOUNT TO  
FINANCE THE APPROPRIATION?”  
Voters approving the Resolution will vote “Yes” and those opposing the Resolution shall vote “No”.  
Votingwill be held at the usual polling places in the Town. Absentee ballots will be availablefrom theTown  
Clerk’s office.  
Approved by the Ledyard Town Council on: _______  
____________________________  
S. Naomi Rodriguez, Chairman  
Moved by Councilor Saccone, seconded by Councilor Buhle  
Discussion: With the May 20, 2025 Referendum not being approved by the voters, the Town  
Council was resubmitting to the voters the request to seek authorization to appropriate an  
additional $1,250,000 to move the Juliet W. Long School Heating Ventilation and Air Condition  
System (HVAC) forward. The Juliet W. Long HVAC Project was one component of the Various  
School Improvement Projects.  
This Resolution would schedule a Special Town Meeting on Monday, June 23, 2025 at 7:00 p.m.  
and to adjourn to a Referendum on the Voting Machines on Tuesday, July 8, 2025 between the  
hours of 12:00 Noon and 8:00 p.m.  
VOTE: 9 - 0 Approved and so declared  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Tony Saccone  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Jessica Buhle  
SECONDER:  
9
Barnes, Brunelle, Buhle, Dombrowski, Garcia-Irizarry, Rodriguez, Ryan,  
Saccone, and St. Vil  
AYE:  
MOTION to adopt a proposed Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget in the amount of $70,440,669  
comprised of:  
4.  
·
·
General Government: $29,933,427_  
Board of Education: $40,507,242.  
Moved by Councilor Buhle, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Moved by Councilor Buhle, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Discussion: Councilor St. Vil stated based on the feedback received from residents responses to  
the Budget Advisory Questions that he would like to amend the Motion on the floor.  
v MOTION to adjust the following Account Lines in the General Government’s proposed  
Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget:  
Account #  
Title  
Finance Director  
Town Clerk  
Land Use Director  
Human Resource Director  
Reduction New Amount  
$17,083 $115,917  
1011-2101-51600  
1011-0311-51600  
1011-4301-51600  
1011-0205-51606  
Total Reductions  
$7,639  
$6,084  
$1,442  
$32,248  
$ 69,761  
$102,066  
$ 96,408  
For a revised General Government Fiscal Year Budget in the amount of $29,901,179.  
Moved by Councilor St. Vil, seconded by Councilor Garcia-Irizarry  
Discussion: Councilor Ryan stated that he would be voting “No” on the proposed amendment for  
the following reasons:  
· What the department heads were worth to the town - Councilor Ryan stated the town’s  
highest paid Administrator/Department Head was the Police Chief at $144,000.  
· Currently all of the town’s Administrators/Department Heads salaries were at; or below the  
midpoint of the pay scale. Councilor Ryan stated according to the Employee Classification  
10 Town Salary Survey that Ledyard was not even paying their department heads above the  
midpoint. He stated that it was not debatable that Ledyard was lucky to have the departments  
heads they have, noting that all of them could easily go somewhere else with the  
qualifications they have.  
Councilor Ryan continued by stating that he was going to provide some data that may shock  
some people in the Council Chambers; and perhaps give pause to some Town Councilors:  
· $180,000 was the average salary for the Ledyard Public School Administrators.  
· $3 Million was the town’s cost for Ledyard’s Public Schools 17 Administrators. This  
included the following:  
ü School Superintendent  
ü School Assistant Superintendent  
ü Director of Finance & Human Capital  
ü High School Principal  
ü High School First Assistant Principal  
ü High School Student Services Administrator  
ü Middle School Principal  
ü Middle School Assistant Principal  
ü Middle School Student Services Administrator  
ü Four Elementary School Principals  
ü Elementary School Student Services Administrator  
ü Director of Student Services  
ü Special Education Director  
Councilor Ryan stated in doing the math the Town’s Chief of Police/Public Safety Department  
Head ($144,000) was earning less than their Elementary School Principals ($166,333). He stated  
Shame on us! noting that he was beside himself that some members of this Town Council  
actually wanted to lower the proposed salaries for these Town Administrators/Department  
Heads. He stated for the combined total cost $32,248 in salary increases for these Town  
Department Heads that Ledyard was actually getting quite a deal. He stated if we want to save  
some real money in the budget that they all know what needed to happen; and he noted that it  
was not on the General Government side of the budget.  
Councilor Ryan stated that he would like to hear the justification on why this School District had  
Principals earning $166,333; which was more than any of the General Government’s  
Administrators/Department Heads. He stated that he would be voting “No” on the budget  
Amendment, because it was shameful that Ledyard does not pay their Administrators/  
Department Heads market value. He stated what was even more shameful was that they were  
now trying to reduce the salary increases that they deserve.  
Councilor Brunelle responded to Councilor Ryan’s comments as follows:  
ü General Government Department Head Salaries were in the middle of the pack compared to  
the salaries for other areas.  
Councilor Brunelle stated that Ledyard’s Education Funding was at the bottom of the pack,  
noting that there was a big gap.  
ü Board of Education Administrators were paid more than the General Government  
Administrators/Department Heads.  
Councilor Brunelle stated that she could not speak for the Board of Education, but that she was  
pretty sure that to be on education side of things, you have to have a lot of education, noting that  
they have to have Doctorates or PhDs, and they have to go to specialty classes and all that good  
stuff. Therefore, she stated what they were paying the Board of Education’s  
Administrators was probably appropriate for their education and skill levels. She went on to state  
that they all know that running a School System was a lot different than running a government  
system. Therefore, she stated that there were no comparison between the Board of Education’s  
Administrators and the Town’s Administrator/Department Heads, noting that they were just  
numbers.  
Councilor Brunelle went on to state that she thought the Budget Amendment was good because  
more people voted that the General Government side of the budget was Too High. Therefore, she  
stated that it did not sit well with her that the Education side of the budget was going to take the  
bigger hit; when it seemed like the voters, who she worked for, and who they all worked for,  
wanted a bigger hit to the government side of the budget. She stated that she did not want to hit  
anything, which was the reason she voted for the budgets. She stated that she thought both  
budgets were great and what was needed to run our town, but unfortunately the voters came out  
and voted the budget down; and as a result things have to be cut. She stated that she did not think  
that it was ethical or moral to give high raises to people when a typical raise for our constituents  
and the people who voted were really lucky if they get a 3% or 4% raise. She stated wanting to  
give someone an 18% increase was obscene, and that she could not ethically and morally say that  
it was okay. She stated that they were all going to cut back and that they would all have to make  
sacrifices. She stated maybe the Town’s Administrators/Department Heads would not get an  
18% raise, but they would still get a raise. She stated that she thought that was more than fair in  
the current situation that they were facing.  
Councilor St. Vil stated that he wanted to clarify his proposed Amendment noting the following;  
ü His proposed salary reductions were to pay raises that were in excess of 10% and 15%. They  
were not a reduction to anyone's pay.  
ü His proposed adjusted salaries represented a 4% increase over the prior year. Councilor St.  
Vil stated for Councilor Ryan to insinuate that a 4% increase was inadequate in today's  
environment; that he would ask that Councilor Ryan poll their constituents and see what their  
average raises were.  
Councilor St. Vil noted as the Mayor said during the May 21, 2025 Finance Committee meeting  
that every dollar counts. Therefore, he stated to save $8,900 that the town was shifting Janitorial  
Services for the Town Hall and Annex Building to once per week instead of the current  
four-days per week; and that town employees would take their own garbage out.  
Councilor St. Vil questioned how Councilor Ryan could disregard a savings in an excess of  
$32,248 for our residents. He noted that Councilor Ryan’s substantiation was to look at what the  
Board of Education was paying their Administrators; rather than look at the merits of the budget  
reduction. He stated as a Member of the Finance Committee that he believed Councilor Ryan  
voted “Yes” to forward the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget to the townspeople. Councilor St. Vil  
stated that he would admit that he voted for the previous budget, however, he stated that he was  
wrong, noting that their constituents have said: “Go back; Take a harder look; And don't leave a  
stone unturned”. Therefore, Councilor St. Vil stated that this was what his proposed Amendment  
to reduce the budget by $32,248 represented. He stated that it was not a reduction of anyone's  
pay, noting it was still an increase.  
Councilor Buhle stated that she was a member of the Finance Committee and that she supported  
the proposed Amendment. She stated that she wanted to be clear that she does think that the  
Town’s Administrators/Department Heads need to be paid. However, she questioned the  
following:  
ü When was the Employee Classification 10 Town Salary Study conducted. Councilor Buhle  
noted that the Study was not linked to any of their Agendas.  
ü The reason they were pushing the salary increases this year; and why they did not do the  
salary increases last year; or two-years ago.  
Mayor Allyn, III, stated that the Employee Classification 10 Town Salary Study was conducted  
two-years ago; and that everyone should have received the Study. He noted the proposed salary  
adjustments would not even bring these Administrator/Department Heads’ salaries to the  
mid-range salary for these same positions in neighboring towns. He stated the Salary Study  
breaks out the salary levels based on years of experience, noting for people with 10+ years of  
experience that they would be at the midpoint or higher. He stated last year they adjusted the  
salaries of two Administrators/Department Heads with the Plan to address these  
Administrators/Department Heads this year. He stated all these Administrators/Department  
Heads were the critical people that keep the Town’s General Government running.  
Mayor Allyn continued by addressing the comments that they need to cut the General  
Government more; and he questioned which facility they would want to close. He stated the only  
remaining “Nice to Have” services were the Bill Library, Gales Ferry Library, and the Senior  
Citizens/Parks & Recreation Center. He stated everything outside of these facilities was central  
service. Therefore, he stated in looking at the proposed Amendment; and given the fact that the  
10 Town Salary Study was two-years old, that they were not really catching these salaries up,  
because the salaries in the study were already 2 years old. He stated with the changes that the  
Finance Committee made to the budget at their May 21, 2025 meeting, that the General  
Government’s proposed budget increase, exclusive of the Healthcare, was 0.2 of 1%; and yet  
nobody was looking at the Board of Education’s 5.98% budget increase. He stated that this just  
confounded him.  
Councilor Buhle questioned when they were telling their taxpayers that a 5.98% increase was too  
big; how they could justify paying 10% salary increases. She went on to state furthermore, they  
were talking about bringing the General Government Administrator/ Department Heads’ salaries  
to the midpoint; when their Education Budget was not even close to being funding at the  
midpoint compared to other towns in the State. Therefore, she stated that if they would bring the  
Education Budget to the midpoint, or even to the bottom quarter of the 169 towns in the State,  
that would be amazing.  
Councilor Buhle went on to state in trying to understand the $32,248 reduction in the grand  
scheme of the budget, that it was not a magic number. She stated that she did not think that the  
voters who said the General Government budget was too high were saying anything about any  
other expenses other than these salary increases, noting that was the feedback she was hearing.  
She stated in looking through the General Government budget and seeing 10% salary increases  
that residents were saying that they were not getting a 10% raise.  
Chairman Rodriguez stated these employees were getting raises, but that the raises were just not  
as high as originally proposed in the budget. She stated in past budget years that they have  
staggered expenses over a couple of years. She noted as an example that when they were  
planning to buy something they would allocate funding over three budget years. Therefore, she  
asked Mayor Allyn if they could do the same to implement these salary increases. She stated that  
she would approve the salary increases if they could implement them over a two-year period.  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry stated before they even started to look at the town’s budget expenses  
for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2025/2026 that they already had a $2 million reduction in  
revenues. Therefore, she stated when she looked at the budget increases that she did not take  
them lightly. She noted that she and Councilor St. Vil asked Human Resources Christine Dias  
for the Employee Classification 10 Town Salary Study. She stated in addition to the Salary Study  
that Ms. Dias also provided a Chart that compared the salaries to other municipalities.  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry noted the following data:  
· Finance Director Position Current Salaries:  
ü Ledyard: $111,459  
ü Stonington $136,000  
ü East Lyme $163,000  
ü Colchester $126,000  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry because she wanted to be fair; compensate their employees  
appropriately; keep their employees working for us; and let them know that we appreciate them  
that she looked at municipalities that were most like Ledyard to see if our salaries were below or  
above the salaries that comparable towns were paying. She noted that Stonington and East Lyme  
had a bigger population and a bigger budget than Ledyard, therefore, she decided to use  
Colchester for her comparison for the Administrator/Department Head Salaries because they  
were similar to Ledyard in terms of population and budget. Therefore, she stated the following  
adjusted salaries that were being proposed this evening were about the same as Colchester.  
Position  
Finance Director:  
Town Clerk  
Land Use Director  
Ledyard (proposed5/27/2025)  
$115,917  
Colchester  
$111,954  
$ 79,022  
$ 99,732  
$ 69,761  
$102,066  
Human Resource Director  
$ 96,408  
$ 76,385  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry went on to note the salary comparisons for the following positions;  
noting that Colchester and other towns had two separate positions for their Parks & Recreation  
Director and for their Senior Citizens Director; where Ledyard has one employee that does both  
jobs:  
Position  
Library Director  
Parks, Rec & Senior Director  
Senior Citizens Director  
Parks & Recreation Director  
Ledyard (proposed budget)  
$ 89,529 $106,404  
$86,642  
Colchester  
$ 75,692  
$ 87,000  
$140,000  
Public Works Director/Town Engineer  
$ 55,540  
Councilor Garcia-Irizarry stated that she was not against the salary increases, however, she stated  
that she was apprehensive about doing them all at once. She stated that she would be more  
comfortable with staggering the increases over a few years noting that it would make sense; and  
it would take into consideration the position of their voters, noting that it would be economically  
feasible for everyone involved, and it would also acknowledge the work these employees were  
doing for the town.  
Mayor Allyn stated that he appreciated Councilor Garcia-Irizarry’s desire to be fair, because he  
also wanted to be fair with these Administrators/Department Heads, which was the reason he  
started this conversation five- years ago. He stated that he started this conversation to bring their  
Administrators/Department Heads salaries in line with market value, not to have massive raise  
increases, and not to bring the salaries up to the high end, but at the same time they should not be  
at the low end for what these critical people do for the town. He stated if they continue with the  
3% or 4% increase model that they would constantly be chasing, and they would never get the  
salaries to where they should be. He stated that the goal and the objective was to bring these  
critical staff people’s salaries to the right place.  
Mayor Allyn stated that he wanted to address the comments regarding Ledyard’s Parks,  
Recreation & Senior Citizens Director wearing two hats and about his salary. He explained that  
the salary was increased by $15,000 when the Parks & Recreation Director took on the role of  
Senior Center Director. He stated because the position was wearing an additional hat that the  
Director received a chunk of money, noting that this position was not left out of the salary  
analysis when he reviewed all the salaries. He stated in reviewing the Employee Classification  
10 Town Salary Survey there were five salaries that stuck out as being below where they should  
be, noting that they addressed the salaries of two positions last year; and that he was addressing  
the salaries for these three positions this year. Therefore, he stated by reducing these salary  
increases that they would be creating a new disparity because last year the Town Council  
supported the salary increases for two positions; but they were not supporting the salary  
increases for these three positions this year.  
Chairman Rodriguez stated at their May 21, 2025 meeting the Finance Committee approved  
$207,500 reductions from the General Government budget. She stated during that meeting the  
Mayor presented $145,700 in budget reductions; and that he was going to provide the additional  
$60,000 reductions for tonight’s meeting. She asked Mayor Allyn if he could review the  
additional $60,000 reductions.  
Mayor Allyn noted with the Finance Committee’s May 21, 2025 reductions that the General  
Government’s budget increase was 0.2 of 1%. He explained because the Capital Budget for both  
the Town and Board of Education resided in the General Government Budget that the total  
reduction to the General Government Budget was $467,571 (GG 207,500 + BOE Capital  
$260,00).  
Mayor Allyn proceeded to review the May 21, 2025 reductions in the amount $147,500 and the  
additional $60,000 for the General Government as follows:  
Account #  
Title  
Reduction  
New Amount  
$7,000  
Town Council  
10110101-5879  
Contingency  
$7,000  
Mayor’s Office  
10110201-58790  
10110203-53700  
Contingency  
Contract Maint/Leases $8,900  
$1,500  
$ 6,000  
$57,700  
Town Clerk’s Office  
1011-0311-51600  
Town Clerk  
$7,639  
$ 69,761  
Human Resources Department  
1011-0205-51606  
Human Resource Director $1,442  
$ 96,408  
Finance Department  
1011-2101-51600  
Finance Director  
Land Use Director  
$17,083  
$115,917  
Land Use Department  
1011-4301-51600  
6,084  
$102,066  
Public Works  
Acct #101401-53300  
10140103-56260  
10140103-56265  
10140107-56301  
10140113-54210  
10140113-58790  
Engineering/MS4  
Gasoline/Oil  
Disel Fuel  
Sand and Salt  
Solid Waste Disposal $5,000  
Bulky Waste Removal $10,000  
$10,000  
$7,500  
$5,000  
$ 70,000  
$ 37,500  
$ 60,000  
$135,000  
$10,000  
$706,300  
$ 90,000  
Police/Dispatch  
10120101-5626  
10120101-53645  
10120101-57300  
Disel/Gasoline  
Training Salary  
New Equip-Fire Arms $2,800  
$8,000  
$5,000  
$62,000  
$80,000  
$ 4,200  
Human Resources  
10110253-52400  
10110253-52310  
Salary Benefit Adj  
Defined Benefit Plan $40,00  
$25,000  
$50,000  
$760,00  
Capital Budget- Reductions  
Title  
Reduction  
New Amount  
PW Heavy Equipment (Long term Budgeting)  
PW Large Trucks (Long Term Budgeting)  
$10,000  
$20,000  
$890,000  
$ 80,000  
$165,000  
Road Restoration  
$10,000  
LHS - Science Lab Upgrades  
JWL - Classroom Renovations  
$125,000  
$135,000  
Deferred to FY 26/27  
Deferred to FY 26/27  
Mayor Allyn went on to explain at the Finance Committee’s May 21, 2025 meeting that he also  
suggested the following increase to the General Government’s Revenue (Transfers-In).  
Revenues  
Account #  
1010502-49002  
Title  
Increase  
New Amount  
Mil Rate Stabilization  
$200,000  
$1,504,675  
Mayor Allyn went on to explain at the Finance Committee’s May 21, 2025 meeting that he also  
suggested the following increase to the General Government’s Revenue (Transfers-In).  
Revenues  
Account #  
1010502-49002  
Title  
Increase  
New Amount  
Mil Rate Stabilization  
$200,000  
$1,504,675  
Councilor Saccone stated that he would be voting against the Amendment on the floor to reduce  
the Administrator/Department Heads salary increases. He stated as a past Fire Chief of the Gales  
Ferry Fire Department that he has worked with the Finance Director and the Town Clerk, noting  
that both of these employees helped him numerous times. He stated that the salaries for these  
Administrator/Department Heads were below where they should be for the education, licenses,  
and other certifications required to perform these jobs. He stated that they have kicked this can  
down the road for at least five years; noting that they have done the same with the Capital  
Improvement Plan (CIP).  
Councilor Saccone went on to note that the taxpayers have spoken; and they wanted the budget  
to be reduced. He stated at their May 21, 2025 meeting the Finance Committee reduced the  
budget by $621,571; and reduced the mil rate increase from 2.76 to 1.99. He stated that the  
Finance Committee has recommended the Town Council approve to forward the following  
proposed Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget in the amount of $70,440,669 comprised of a General  
Government: $29,933,427_ and Board of Education: $40,507,242. to a Second Referendum, noting  
that it would require a project mil rate of 37.20.  
Councilor Saccone stated that the proposed Amendment to reduce the salary increases by  
$32,248 would be less than a $5.00 per month savings in their tax bills; and it would not lower the  
1.99 mil rate increase. He went on to state that Finance Director Matthew Bonin has made the town  
nearly $2 million in interest earnings over the last two years. He stated these revenues have saved  
Ledyard residents $2 million in tax dollars. He stated these Administrator/Department Heads have  
earned these salary increases, noting that he would be voting “No” on the Amendment on the  
floor.  
Chairman Rodriguez stated these Administrator/Department Heads were getting raises noting that  
they all know that they were qualified; they were excellent employees, and they want them all to  
stay, noting that they were still getting a raise. However, she stated they also have a very difficult  
budget, and the residents have spoken.  
Chairman Rodriguez continued by stating that she was shocked by the results of the Advisory  
Questions noting that the General Government received about 100 more votes than the Board of  
Education in response to whether the budget was Too High. However, she stated if they include  
the Capital Budget cuts that the Board of Education’s budget was being cut by almost double the  
amount that the General Government was being cut.  
Chairman Rodriguez stated that she understands the Employee Classification 10 Town Salary  
Study was done about two-years ago. Therefore, she questioned the reason the Mayor did not  
begin to implement the salary increases last year, stating that the increases could have been made  
over a couple of budget years. Mayor Allyn provided some background noting that they began  
discussing the need to bring the Administrator/Department Heads salaries in line with market  
value for the positions. He stated because another town was already conducting a Salary Survey  
that Ledyard was able to save about $30,000 - $50,000 by using their Salary Study instead of  
conducting Study on their own. He stated in reviewing the data that there were five salaries that  
were below their counterparts in neighboring municipalities. He stated they began the process to  
bring these employees’ salaries to the right place last year, noting that they addressed the salaries  
of two positions during the current fiscal year, and that they were addressing the salaries for  
these three positions in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget. Chairman Rodriguez stated  
that they wanted to give the salary increases, however, the voters have spoken loud and clear.  
Therefore, she stated that she thought it would be best to increase these salaries incrementally  
over a couple of budget years, noting that these Administrators/Department Heads would still be  
getting raises.  
Councilor Buhle stated that she was proud of the way the Finance Committee worked together at  
their May 21, 2025 meeting. She stated if they were going to discuss incremental raises that she  
would agree with Mayor Allyn that 4% increases were not incremental to a point that would  
bring the salaries inline moving forward. However, she stated when the taxpayers looked at the  
budget and saw these salary increases that they were commenting that their salary increases did  
not even come close to what the Administrator/Department Heads were getting; especially when  
they were talking about 31% of their residents being on the Asset Limited Income Constrained  
Employed (ALICE) Report.  
Councilor Buhle continued by questioning whether there was an incremental increase that they  
could agree on; without saying “ All or Nothing; or All or 4%”. She questioned whether they  
could come to a point where they could say half this year and half next year, or whatever they  
could agree on.  
Councilor Ryan stated that he was disappointed by Councilor Buhle’s comments, noting at their  
May 21, 2025 Finance Committee meeting that she supported the proposed Fiscal Year  
2025/2026 Budget that the Finance Committee moved forward to the Town Council for action  
this evening; and now it seemed like she was backtracking. He stated that he expected tonight’s  
Town Council meeting would be procedural, just to vote on the budget that Councilor Buhle had  
previously agreed to support. He stated that it was unfortunate that she was not supporting it  
anymore.  
Councilor Ryan continued by noting that Councilor St. Vil stated that the  
Administrators/Department Heads were getting a raise in the adjusted salary numbers that he  
provided in his proposed Amendment; and although he was cutting their increase that he was  
providing them with a 4% increase; which in his words was enough. Therefore, Councilor Ryan  
stated that if they thought a 4% increase was enough, then he was happy to go to a 4% increase  
on the Board of Education’s side of the Budget instead of their requested 5.98% increase. He  
stated if they were going to talk about percentage increases that he would like to note the  
following percentage increases in the Board of Education Budget:  
ü 6%; 5.57%; 5.86%.  
ü 16.25%; 8.24%.  
ü 10.75%;. 25.11%  
ü 6.24%; 36.78%; 7.39%.  
Councilor Ryan stated these percentage were the salary increases for the Teachers,  
Paraprofessionals; and Administrative Assistants; and that he could go on listing the Board of  
Education Employee’s salary increases. He stated that he was disappointed that some members  
on this Town Council were  
trying to cut $32,248 from the General Government’s  
Administrators/Department Heads. He stated that they were talking about how every dollar  
counts; and yet they were still voting for a 5.57 % increase for the Board of Education Budget.  
Councilor Ryan continued by stating if they took the Healthcare Costs out of the budget equation  
that the General Government Budget increase was slightly over 2%. He stated if they put that  
number to the townspeople that he did not believe that they would receive the same reaction  
from the voters on the Advisory Questions. He stated when the general public looks at the  
budget, many do not realize that all of the Healthcare Costs for both the General Government  
Employees ($1,122,900) and the Board of Education Employees ($5,193,830) was recorded on  
the General Government side of the budget ledger. He stated while they would never know that  
answer; that this was his conjecture for the reason they received the response that the General  
Government Budget was Too High.  
Councilor Ryan went on to address Chairman Rodriguez’s concern that the Finance Committee’s  
May 21, 2025 budget cuts were higher for the Board of Education’s Budget than they were for  
the General Government. He stated that he would assume that she was looking at the dollars and  
not looking at the percentage, noting that the Board of Education’s expenses were 70% of the  
budget and the General Government’s expenses were 30% of the budget. He stated that the  
Finance Committee’s budget cuts were based on the percentage of the budgets, and he noted that  
Councilor Buhle could attest to that. Therefore, he stated that the budget cuts were proportional  
based on the operating budgets; and based on the capital budgets. He stated that this was  
important to keep in mind when they were looking at dollars versus percentage, noting that they  
should be looking at the percentage.  
Councilor Ryan stated that if they do not pay their employees a competitive salary they would go  
elsewhere, and that it would end up costing the town more money because the town would not  
be able to hire the same caliber person for the same salary of the person that left. He stated that  
he did not need to explain this scenario to those who were involved in the private business  
sector.  
Councilor Barnes stated that he appreciated the comments from everyone on a very important topic,  
noting that they have a tough decision to make. He stated that there was not anybody here who  
would not want someone to receive a fair and competitive wage; regardless of whether they were on  
the Board of Education or General Government side of the budget. He stated that he was struggling  
with the Amendment on the floor, noting that the Motion would not allow the salary gaps to be  
removed. He stated that he did not know whether there was a mechanism that would allow that to  
happen in a limited period of time. Therefore, he stated that he could not support the Amendment on  
the floor this evening.  
Councilor Dombrowski stated that he applauded Councilor St. Vil’s thoughts, in that they were  
trying to squeeze every penny out of the bucket to make it right. He stated that they had hard  
decisions to make, noting that this process was emotional for a lot of people because of what the  
impacts would be for both the General Government and for the Board of Education. Therefore, he  
stated that he appreciated everyone’s candor and their discussion.  
Councilor Dombrowski continued to state that he appreciated the work the Mayor and his  
Department Heads did to provide $207,500 in budget reductions; and the work of the Finance  
Committee to reduce the Board of Education’s budget, which included $160,000 from their  
operational budget; and $260,000 from their capital projects by delaying those projects to next year.  
He noted the total combined reductions that the Finance Committee put forward this evening was in  
the amount of $621,571. However, he stated that it was his opinion that the budget should have  
been reduced by $1 million.  
Councilor Dombrowski thanked everyone for all their hard work that has been done to support the  
proposed budget reductions and to move the Revised Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget forward to the  
townspeople for the Second Referendum on June 10, 2025. However, he stated that he would not  
support the Amendment on the floor this evening to reduce the salary increases by a total of  
$32,248; and that he would also be voting “No” on the Revised Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget.  
Chairman Rodriguez thanked the Town Council for their comments; and she called for a vote on the  
proposed Amendment; asking that the Amendment on the floor be read:  
vMOTION to adjust the following Account Lines in the proposed Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget:  
Account #  
Title  
Reduction New Amount  
$17,083 $115,917  
$ 69,761  
1011-2101-51600  
1011-0311-51600  
1011-4301-51600  
1011-0205-51606  
Total Reductions  
Finance Director  
Town Clerk  
Land Use Director  
$7,639  
$6,084  
$102,066  
$ 96,408  
Human Resource Director  
$1,442  
$32,248  
For a revised General Government Fiscal Year Budget in the amount of $29,901,179.  
Moved by Councilor St. Vil, seconded by Councilor Garcia-Irizarry  
VOTE:  
5 - 4 Approved and so declared (Barnes, Dombrowski, Ryan, Saccone- not in favo  
Chairman Rodriguez called for a vote on the Main Motion as amended; and she asked the  
Motion be read:  
MOTION to adopt a proposed Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget as amended in the amount of  
$70,408,421 comprised of:  
· General Government: $29,901,179_  
· Board of Education: $40,507,242.  
Moved by Councilor Buhle, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Information: In addition to the budget adjustments approved during this meeting the Revised  
Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget, as noted above, included the following Board of Education  
adjustments that were approved at the May 21, 2025 Finance Committee Meeting:  
Board of Education Reductions  
Board of Education- Discretion to make reductions $160,000  
Revenues  
Account #  
1017002-42018  
Title  
Increase  
Vo-AG Grant  
New Amount  
$ 68,000  
$ 549,385  
VOTE:  
7 - 2 Approved and so declared (Dombrowski, Ryan- not in favor)  
APPROVED AS AMENDED  
Jessica Buhle  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
7
2
Barnes, Brunelle, Buhle, Garcia-Irizarry, Rodriguez, Saccone, and St. Vil  
Dombrowski, and Ryan  
AYE:  
NAY:  
General Items  
Discussion regarding the Town Council Summer Meeting Schedule.  
5.  
The Town Council discussed their schedules and, by consensus, agreed to cancel the following  
meetings for their Summer Meeting Schedule:  
ü
June 25, 2025  
ü July 23, 2025  
ü August 27, 2025  
RECEIVED AND FILED  
ADJOURNMENT  
RESULT:  
VI.  
Councilor Buhle moved to adjourn, seconded by Councilor St. Vil  
VO9TE- 0: Approved and so declared. The meeting adjourned at 6:23 p.m.  
_____________________________________  
Transcribed by Roxanne M. Maher  
Administrative Assistant to the Town Council  
I, S. Naomi Rodriguez, Chairman of the Ledyard Town Council,  
hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and  
correct copy of the minutes of the Special Town Council  
Meeting held on May 27, 2025.  
____________________________________  
S. Naomi Rodriguez, Chairman  
DISCLAIMER:  
Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the Town.  
The Town Council's Official Agenda and final Minutes will be on file in the Town Clerk's  
Office.