741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Land Use/Planning/Public Works  
Committee  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman S. Naomi  
Rodriguez  
Regular Meeting  
Monday, June 2, 2025  
6:00 PM  
Town Hall Annex - Hybrid Format  
In -Person Location goes here  
Join Zoom Meeting from your Computer, Smart Phone or Tablet:  
Or by Audio Only: Telephone: +1 646 558 8656; Meeting ID: 868 5514 2443; Passcode:  
052224  
I
CALL TO ORDER  
The meeting was called to order by Councilor St. Vil at 6:04 p.m. at  
the Town Hall Annex Building.  
Councilor St. Vil welcomed all to the Hybird Meeting noting for the Town Council  
Land Use/Planning/Public Works Committee and members of the Public who were  
participating via video conference that the remote meeting information was available  
on the Agenda that was posted on the Town’s Website - Granicus-Legistar Meeting  
Portal.  
II.  
ROLL CALL  
Gary St. Vil  
Present:  
Kevin Dombrowski  
Carmen Garcia-Irizarry  
Excused:  
In addition, the following were present:  
Elizabeth BurdicLkand Use Director/Town Planer  
Carol SchneRideesrident  
Roxanne MaAhderministrative Assistant  
III.  
RESIDENTS & PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS  
None.  
IV.  
V.  
PRESENTATIONS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS  
None.  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
MOTION to approve the Land Use/Planning /Public Works Minutes of May 5, 2025  
Moved by Councilor Dombrowski, seconded by Councilor St. Vil  
VOTE: 2 - 0 Approved and so declared  
VI.  
OLD BUSINESS  
Continued discussion regarding the progress of enforcing regulations to address blight issues.  
1.  
Councilor St. Vil noted that the Blight Report was provided for tonight’s meeting;  
and thanked Zoning Enforcement Officer Hannah Gienau noting that he appreciated  
her work. However, he asked whether the Blighted Properties that have come into  
compliance and the cases have been closed could be removed from the List.  
Land Use Director/Town Planner Elizbeth Burdick stated that Blight Enforcement  
Officer Hannah Gienau has been doing a good job with inspections, telephone calls,  
letters, and following up.  
Ms. Burdick provided an overview of the new properties that have been added to the  
Blight List since the May Report as follows:  
· 370 Pumpkin Hill Road - Discarded furniture and junk on the curb of the  
property. RVC sent on 05/07/25. NOV with intent to cite to be issued next,  
following standard Blight Ordinance procedures.  
· 51 Kings Highway - The windows on the first and second floor were boarded up.  
Broken electrical boxes and two AC units were ripped open and stripped of parts.  
Discarded junk and trash of various items. The vegetation in the parking lot and  
around the building was greater than 9" in height. RVC sent on 05/07/25 and a  
follow-up inspection will be conducted on or about 06/10/25.  
· 33 Stoney Brook Road - Improper storage of trash on the property. Will make  
follow-up call with the owner to discuss how to be in compliance. Large family  
with 9 people possibly living in the home.  
It was noted that the Town would be changing to a new Curbside Household  
Trash Collection Contractor on July 1, 2025. Perhaps for an additional deposit fee  
the family could obtain an additional trash cart. Ms. Burdick stated that she would  
follow-up with Public Works Director/Town Engineer Steve Masalin.  
· 16 West Drive- Blighted property and RV that appeared inoperable leaning  
towards roadway. The rear of the home was in a poor condition due to the fire.  
Will follow- up with Fire Marshall and inspection of the property.  
·
5 Long Pond Road - Property has a lot of junk in the yard with several  
unregistered vehicles, including an old semi-trailer. Will contact owner for a  
meeting with the Land Use Director and ZEO for compliance. Also zoning  
violations present. Sent follow-up email to set up a meeting. No response yet.  
Will convene with LUD for next steps.  
· 543R Long Pond Road- Has a lot of junk and garbage visible from the Cider Hill  
Road way but hidden on the other side of Long Pond. There also appears to be  
an RV but it could not be determined if it had registered plates. RVC drafted  
and awaiting review.  
Ms. Burdick stated that she would let Zoning Enforcement Officer/Wetlands  
Enforcement Officer Ms. Gienau know that the LUPPW Committee would only like  
to receive the Open Blight Cases and the Site Inspections from the preceding month.  
Ms. Burdick went on to state that the Land Use Office has been busy with decks,  
pools, sheds, additions, and new houses. She stated that Ms. Gienau was doing a  
great job noting that she has begun the CAZEO (Connecticut Association of Zoning  
Enforcement Officials) Certification Process, explaining that in addition to the  
several months of training courses that those seeking the CAZEO Certification were  
also required to have two-year’s experience as a Zoning Enforcement Officer (ZEO);  
and a Case Study, which Ms. Gienau has already been working has also been working  
on. She stated that Ms. Gienau would be using the property located across the street  
from Holdridge’s on Route 117, Colonel Ledyard Highway, for her Case Study. She  
stated as she previously reported at the LUPPW Committee’s May 5, 2025 meeting  
that when the young man submitted his Application that it did not match the Site  
Plan; and therefore, the Planning & Zoning Commission Denied the Application  
Without Prejudice because it did not represent the existing conditions. She stated the  
Land Use Department was moving forward with the Enforcement Action, explaining  
that in the event the Applicant decided not to resubmit their Application, they would  
have the Citation on file. She stated in the meantime that Mr. Gardner had his Crew  
(Diter & Gardner Surveyors) at the property several times. She stated the young man  
was hoping to resubmit to the Planning & Zoning Commission; and they would see  
where it goes from there. She stated that should the Applicant not respond to the  
Citation that they would follow the Enforcement Sequence that Mr. Eric Treaster  
discussed at the October 7, 2024 LUPPW Committee meeting, noting that using that  
process would be their last resort.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Spicer Homestead Ruins - Historical Research and Photos.  
2.  
Land Use Direct/Town Planner Elizabeth Burdick noted during the LUPPW  
Committee’s May 5, 2025 Meeting, at which Historic District Commission Members  
Ms. Karen Parkinson and Mr. Doug Kelley were in attendance that he discussed the  
following:  
· What’s Legally Required” - Ms. Burdick stated at the meeting that she  
mentioned to them that the Land Use Department recently received a new book  
that was published regarding “What’s Legally Required”. She stated there was a  
section in the book regarding Historic District Commissions and it laid out the  
steps that had to be taken to seek a Historic Designation; and how to go about  
getting these types of things done.  
· Review Steps for Historic Designation - Ms. Burdick noted that she offered to  
meet with Historic District Commission Member Mrs. Parkinson to go over  
those steps.  
· Ms. Burdick offered to attend a Historic District Commission meeting to review  
the step-by-step process regarding the things that they would need to do to move  
their initiative forward  
· Mrs. Burdick noted that no one from the Historic District Commission has  
contacted her to date.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Discussion to consider drafting an Ordinance to address Noise Issues, as requested in Ms.  
Johnston’s August 12, 2024 email.  
3.  
Councilor St. Vil stated based on the LUPPW Committee’s research he wrote a letter  
to Ms. Johnston to inform her of their findings that a Noise Ordinance was not  
needed because the Connecticut General Statutes included provisions to address  
noise through the Police Department. He stated that his letter dated April 24, 2025  
was attached to LF #2024-0778 on the Meeting Portal.  
Councilor St. Vil went on to state at their June 2, 2025 Meeting that the LUPPW  
Committee agreed to keep this item on their Agenda for one or two more meetings;  
and that they would follow up with Ms. Burdick and Chief Rich to see if they have  
any additional information. He questioned whether Ms. Burdick has received any  
feedback from the neighboring properties to Prides Corner Nursery Farm.  
Land Use Director/town Planner Elizabeth Burdick reported the following:  
· Property Survey - Ms. Burdick stated that Prides Corner Nursery Farm hired  
B&L to conduct a property survey. She stated because of the cost to survey the  
entire property that she asked Prides Corner Nursery Farm to have an A2 Survey  
in the area of the Greenhouses. She stated the nearest Greenhouse was 141 feet  
away from the property line.  
· Noise Complaints - Ms. Burdick stated that the Land Use Office has not received  
any other complaints since she met with the Owners of Prides Corner Nursery  
Farm at her Office. She stated that during their meeting that she asked the Farm to  
be a good neighbor and to have their workers keep the volume of the music down.  
· Green House Permits - Ms. Burdick stated they still need to get the Green  
Houses permitted. However, she stated that based on the A2 Survey that they all  
meet the setback lines for the Zone.  
Ms. Burdick stated during her June 12, 2025 Planner’s Report to the Planning &  
Zoning Commission that she would review the A2 Survey and the Green Houses  
to see if they want to approve it a Site Plan, noting that the Commission may find  
that the Zoning Enforcement Officer could address it administratively with  
“Conditions”.  
· Wetland Protection -Ms. Burdick noted that she believed there was a man-made  
pond in the area, noting that they would need to review the GIS Map. She  
explained that there were two types of Wetlands Maps: (1) Wetlands identified in  
an Subdivision Plan; and (2) Wetlands identified by soil scientists that were  
plotted on a map. She stated that Prides Corner Nursery Farm would also need to  
be comply with the Wetlands Regulations.  
Councilor Dombrowski question whether there was any brush or barrier along the  
property line between the homeowner and the farm, noting that a mitigation  
action could be to plant some greenery, or something that would act to buffer the  
sound. Ms. Burdick stated that she thought the area was wooded, however, she  
stated that she planned to visit the site.  
Councilor St. Vil stated that Ms. Burdick noted there were two Wetlands Maps;  
therefore, he questioned which Wetlands Map the town uses.  
Ms. Burdick explained although they have an Official Wetlands Map, that she  
did not believe it was very accurate. Therefore, she stated as new Subdivision  
Plan Surveys were submitted, which included wetlands that were identified by a  
soil scientist; they were sent to the GIS Mapping Company to update the GIS  
System. Therefore, she stated in using the GIS Map that there were two (2)  
different categories, noting that they could click on the ones they know because  
they were the wetlands that were mapped and given to the GIS Company; and /or  
they could click on the General Maps. She went on to explain in looking at some  
of the older subdivisions dating back to the 1970’s that say “Wetlands” that when  
they take the “Wetlands Overlay” off the whole neighborhood was built on  
wetlands that were filled-in.  
Ms. Burdick went on to note that when former Town Planner Bill Hasse was here  
that there was an Old Wetlands Map and the New Wetlands Map; and she  
explained that was the reason they use both Maps and they also require the  
Applicants to have the wetlands flagged by soil scientists; stating that Wetlands  
was never an exact science. She stated that she has been a Wetlands Officer since  
2004; and she could tell them that it was never cut and dry. She state that this was  
the reason she wanted to bring the man-made pond to their attention because  
without a soil scientist flagging the Wetlands in a Soil Scientist Report, that they  
cannot know what was there, and she has explained this to the owners of the  
Prides Corner Nursery Farm. She stated that they do their best based on the  
mapping they have; however, she stated if there was any question they require the  
Application to hire a professional.  
Councilor St. Vil stated at their May 5, 2025 LUPPW Committee meeting they  
agreed to keep this item on for two more reporting periods. He stated that this was the  
first meeting, noting that if they do not receive any other feedback by their next  
meeting (July 7, 2025) that the Committee would remove it from their Agenda. He  
stated if Ms. Johnston had any further issues that he thought that she would have  
followed the process that was outlined in their April 24, 2025 letter; which was to  
contact the Police Department.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Any other Old Business proper to come before the Committee.  
None.  
4.  
VII. NEW BUSINESS  
Any other New Business proper to come before the Committee.  
1.  
None.  
IV  
ADJOURNMENT  
Councilor Dombrowski moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by  
Councilor St. Vil.  
VOTE:  
6:14 p.m.  
2- 0 Approved and so declared, the meeting was adjourned at  
Respectfully submitted,  
Gary St. Vil  
Committee Chairman  
Land Use/Planning/Public Works Committee  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.