Moderator St. Vil then issued a call for Public Comment.
Town Councilor, April Brunelle, asked if it is customary that we don’t involve a realtor to do a title
search when there is a transfer of land. She also asked that instead of the land being turned over to
the town, could it have been just added to the pentway.
Mayor, Fred Allyn III, responded that as an example, the town requires road widening strips when
new subdivisions are put in and these transfer all of the time. The Town doesn’t have attorneys
involved with that. Mayor Allyn added that these properties are currently under private ownership.
Councilor, Kevin Dombrowski, mentioned that as Public Works Director, Steve Masalin stated, it’s
under an ordinance that the town maintain these properties that are already privately owned under a
pentway. It’s part of the conformity that the town assumes these small portions to maintain.
Councilor, Tim Ryan, clarified that the only thing the town is voting on tonight is the transfer of the
land to the town. All that’s been discussed about private ownership is not what is being voted on.
Even if the vote goes through and the town takes ownership of these easements, the easements that
the town would take ownership of are along the pentway.
Mayor Allyn, added that there are three parcels. Two of these parcels are easements. The 0.04
parcel is the only parcel that the town will acquire ownership of.
Terry Jones, 27 Monticello Drive, mentioned that during the public hearing there was some
back and forth of ownership of the parcel. If the claim by Mr. Ryan Allen turns out to be
correct and the action is taken tonight at the town meeting, would it be a legal conveyance if
the person who conveyed the property did not have ownership.
Public Works Director, Steve Masalin, stated that they would have to look at what’s being
conveyed. He said you’re looking at easements which are not the actual property. He’s not
suggesting the easements would be nullified but it would just fall back on the ordinance
stipulation that says the town has ten feet off the road. The parcel that’s being conveyed is by
Mr. Cardinal and is not part of 1764 Route 12. The parcel that the pentway runs through that
the town would be gaining is 2 Thamesview Pentway. Then what is left is the easement from
Mr. Stanavage that is granted on his presumed ownership of 1764 Route 12.
Mr. Terry Jones, stated that the 0.04 acres would still be valid. The question is only regarding
the easement. Perhaps the town may even be able to take it by public domain.
Mr. Steve Masalin, stated that no access will be compromised.
Councilor, Gary St. Vil clarified that there are two portions of this motion. The first is to
rectify the conformity of a cluster of lots in said location. No one seems to disagree with that.
The only disagreement heard in the public hearing and at this special town meeting is the right
to ownership. If ownership is a concern, it would be a recourse for any individual that believes
a land is not owned by the town or others doing business within the town. He also stated that at
this meeting there is not the correct knowledge base or authority to answer that concern.