proposed text amendments to the Ledyard Zoning Regulations regarding Parking sections as
follows: Table of Contents, 2.2 (Definitions), 6.5.1 (Technology Park District), 6.5.2
(Conservation and Traffic Mitigation (Overlay) District), 8.1 (Accessory Apartment), 8.6
(Bed and Breakfast (Accessory Use), 8.7 (Campgrounds), 8.8 (Child Care Centers), 8.9
(Commercial Caretaker Apartment, Accessory), 8.10 (Commercial Services), 8.17 (Home
Occupation, Accessory Use), 8.18 (Hospital and Emergency Medical Facilities), 8.19
(Hotel), 8.20 (Kennel, Commercial),8.21.1 (Membership Clubs - Firearms), 8.21.2
(Membership Clubs - No Firearms) 8.22 (Mixed Use - Residential & Commercial Uses),
8.24 (Motor Vehicle, Recreational Vehicle, Boat and/or Equipment Repair Facilities), 8.25
(Nursing Home & Residential Care Home), 8.26 (Personal Service Establishment), 8.28
(Residence, Multi-Family - Apartments, Condominiums, Townhouses), 8.33 (Temporary
Forms of Outdoor Entertainment), 9.0 (Site Development Standards - Applicability), 9.3.
(Site Development Standards - Landscape Design Standards and Requirements), 9.4 (Site
Development Standards - Parking Requirements and Design Standards), 9.4.1 (Site
Development Standards - Parking Requirements and Design Standards - Parking Location
and Design Objectives), 9.4.2 (Site Development Standards - Parking Requirements and
Design Standards - Parking Ratios) , 9.4.3 (Site Development Standards - Parking
Requirements and Design Standards - Off-Street Loading Requirements), 9.4.4 (Site
Development Standards - Parking Requirements and Design Standards - Parking Facilities),
9.4.5 (Site Development Standards - Parking Requirements and Design Standards - Parking
for Buses and other Large Vehicles) , 9.4.6 (Site Development Standards - Parking
Requirements and Design Standards - Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements). (Submitted
3/16/26, Date of Receipt 4/9/26, Set Public Hearing for 5/14/26, DRD N/A - Commission
Application)
Chairman Wood opened the public hearing. He stated that all present Commissioners are
seated for the public hearing. Commissioners Woody, Ribe and Miello stated for the record
that they had reviewed the recordings and all exhibits and are fully informed to make a
decision if required.
Eric Treaster, 10 Huntington Way, Ledyard, addressed the Commission and presented his
comments to the Commission. He commented that a visual aid included in the regulations
could help residents and developers understand parking requirements. He stated his
disagreement with the minimum parking requirements for multifamily developments. He
stated that the Commission should take advantage of any flexibility in PA25-1. He stated that
state legislation is wrong. He stated the Commission should not establish a Conservation and
Traffic Mitigation District. He stated his disagreement with parking needs assessments.
Vice Chairman Woody and Mr. Treaster discussed Mr. Treaster’s concerns about parking
needs assessments. Mr. Treaster stated his distaste for PA25-1. Chairman Wood asked if he
had brought his interpretation to state legislators for consideration. Mr. Treaster stated no.
Mr. Treaster stated that he would like the Commission to amend their application to include
his suggested language as he felt their proposal is too restrictive. Mr. Treaster’s comments
were marked as exhibit #30.
Dave Schroeder, 290 Whalehead Road, Gales Ferry, understands that the Commission is
trying to comply with PA25-1 through their application. He felt that the Commission was
overly restrictive in their application compared to what is required by PA25-1. He concurred
with Mr. Treaster’s previous public comment. He praised Mr. Treaster. He felt the law can