741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Finance Committee  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman Gary St. Vil  
Regular Meeting  
Wednesday, October 15, 2025  
5:00 PM  
Town Hall Annex Building - Hybrid  
Format  
In -Person: Council Chambers, Town Hall Annex Building  
Remote Participation: Information Noted Below:  
Join Zoom Meeting from your Computer, Smart Phone or Tablet:  
by Audio only: Telephone: +1 646 558 8656; Meeting ID: 875 0513 9543; Passcode:  
482120  
I
CALL TO ORDER  
the Meeting was called to order by Committee Chairman Councilor Saccone at 5:00  
p.m. at the Council Chambers Town Hall Annex Building.  
Councilor Saccone welcomed all to the Hybrid Meeting. He stated for the Town  
Council Finance Committee and members of the Public who were participating via  
video conference that the remote meeting information was available on the Agenda  
that was posted on the Town’s Website - Granicus-Legistar Meeting Portal.  
II.  
ROLL CALL  
Tony Saccone  
Tim Ryan  
Present:  
Jessica Buhle  
Excused:  
In addition, the following were present:  
Fred Allyn, IIMI ayor  
Matthew Bonin Finance Director  
Jeff Erhart Gales Ferry Fire Chief District #2  
Jason HartlingSchool Superintendent  
Roxanne Maher Administrative Assistant  
v
MOTION to amend the Agenda to change New Business Item # 3 from a MOTION to a only  
a Discussion as noted below:  
(3)  
Discussion regarding MOTION to recommend the Town Council the appropriation of  
the receipt of additional Impact Aid Revenues. and transfer $157,133 from Account  
#10188210-59300 (Transferred Funds) to Account #22570101-58250 (BOE CNR  
Reserve Fund);  
In addition, appropriate $157,133 to Account #225670101-58250 (BOE CNR Reserve  
Fund).  
Moved by Councilor Ryan, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Discussion: None.  
VOTE:2- 0 Approved and so declared  
A motion was made by Ryan, seconded by Saccone, that this be Approved and so declared. The  
motion carried by the following vote:  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saccone and Ryan  
Buhle  
AYE:  
EXCUSED:  
III.  
IV.  
V.  
RESIDENTS & PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS  
None.  
PRESENTATIONS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS  
None  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
MOTION to approve the Finance Committee Regular Meeting Minutes of September 17,  
2025.  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
Finance Director’s Report - Fiscal Year 2025-2026  
VI.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin reported that the Annual Audit for Fiscal Year Ending June 30,  
2025 was underway. He stated last week LawsonAllenClifton LLP were on-sit at the Town Hall.  
However, he stated a lot of the work they do can now be done remotely, noting they have access  
to the Munis Financial System. He stated the Annual Audit was now being handled by the  
Auditors.  
CONTINUE  
Financial Reports - Fiscal Year 2025-2026  
RESULT:  
VII.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin noted the following:  
· Pre-Audit Finals - Mr. Bonin stated attached to tonight’s Agenda on the Meeting Portal were the  
Pre-Audit Final Reports” explaining these Reports were done after the Finance Department  
completed their Year-End Adjustments. He stated the Annual Audit work was being handled by  
Auditors LawsonAllenClifton, LLP.  
· Projected Surplus Report - Mr. Bonin stated that he provided the Finance Committee with  
hard copies this evening of the Projected Surplus for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025. He  
stated that this Report was based on the Year-to-Date Budget verses Actuals for the  
Revenues Report and the Expenditures Reports. He noted the following projections  
ü General Government Projected Surplus - Just under a $200,000 Surplus for the General  
Government- Mr. Bonin stated that this number included not having to use the Mil Rate  
Stabilization Fund, as had been budgeted.  
Councilor Saccone questioned the dollar amount that they has planned to use from the Mil  
Rate Stabilization Fund. Mr. Bonin stated that it was about $1 million.  
o Agri-Science (Vo-Ag) $250,636 Revenue Overage. Mr. Bonin explained that  
the Projected Surplus Report already takes into consideration the transfer of  
the $250,636 to the Board of Education Capital Account; as approved by the  
Town Council at their September 10, 2025 meeting.  
o Impact Aid $157,133 Revenue Overage - Mr. Bonin stated the Projected  
Surplus does not take into account moving the Impact Aid Revenue overage,  
should the Town Council take an action to do that.  
ü Board of Education Projected Operating Budget Surplus for Fiscal Year  
2024/2025 - Just under $213,000. Mr. Bonin stated in accordance with “A  
Resolution Creating a Funding Mechanism for Making Annual Appropriations to  
a Capital Reserve Fund for the Board of Education” - Adopted on September 28,  
1988; that these funds would be transferred to the Board of Education’s Capital  
Account. Mr. Bonin  
explained that this transfer of surplus funds; which would come off of the Fund  
Balance, would take place in the next fiscal year (fy 25/26), because the transfer  
had to done after the Annual Audit has been completed.  
Fund Balance - Councilor Ryan questioned whether the net results would mean that  
the Fund Balance for the start of the current fiscal year (25/26) would be slightly less  
than the previous year. Mr. Bonin stated that Councilor Ryan’s comment was correct,  
noting with transferring the Board of Education’s $213,000 Operating Surplus from  
Fund Balance to their Capital Account, that the Fund Balance for the current fiscal  
year (fy 25/26) would be less than the prior year.  
Board of Education Surplus - Councilor Saccone stated with the transfer of the  
Board of Education’s Operating Budget Surplus of $213,000 that they would receive  
a total of $463,636 in their Capital Account. Mr. Bonin stated that once the Annual  
Audit was completed that the Board of Education would have received $250,636  
(Agri-Science (Vo-AG Revenue Overage) plus the $213,000 (BOE Operating  
Surplus) totaling $463,636. He stated although he did not expect the surplus number  
would change, that they had to wait until the Annual Audit has been completed for  
the Board of Education’s Operating Surplus to be transferred to their Capital  
Non-Recurring Account (CNR).  
Undesignated Fund Balance - Councilor Ryan stated post Audit, if the numbers  
hold, that thew town’s Undesignated Fund Balance would be equivalent to the  
previous year. Mr. Bonin stated correct, explaining that there was a town goal to  
increase their Undesignated Fund Balance. Mayor Allyn, III noted per the “Town of  
Ledyard Fund Balance Reserve Policy” that the Town Council adopted on May 23, 2018  
set a goal to increase the Town’s Undesignated Fund Balance to 10% by 2037 of the  
town’s total operating expenditure budget. He stated that they were trying to meet that  
goal in some small incremental manner each year that they can.  
CONTINUE  
VIII. OLD BUSINESS  
Discussion regarding potential uses for the funding received from the National Opioid  
RESULT:  
1.  
Settlement Payments.  
Mayor Allyn, III, stated that the Town would continue to receive funding from the  
Sackler Family Trust - Purdue Pharma Distributor Opioid Settlement through 2034;  
noting that recently the Town received notification that three or four more  
manufactures would be settling. He suggested as the Finance Committee prepares its  
Transition Memo” to the incoming Committee that they suggest putting this item on  
their Agenda twice a year to consider the distribution of funds to non-profits that  
were doing the work in their community for Opioid Prevention and Recovery, which  
included a variety of different programs such as  
· Ledyard Prevention Coalition  
· Community Speaks Out  
· Connecticut Recovery Support .  
· The DARE Program in Ledyard Public Schools  
Councilor Saccone questioned whether other towns were doing anything different  
with their Opioid Settlement Funding. Mayor Allyn stated he has seen towns do a  
number of things with the Opioid Settlement Funding noting as an example that  
Groton heavily invested in Community Speaks Out. However, he stated that he  
believed that Ledyard was doing a good job to level spread the funding amongst other  
Organizations, similar to how they used their American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)  
Funding. He noted that the  
Organizations that Ledyard has provided funding to has ranged from helping  
individuals with addiction, to rehousing people, to helping people obtain some  
workforce experience, working with the kids through the DARE Program, and  
training other organizations and family members how to administer Narcan in the  
event of an overdose. He stated that hopefully the Community Relations Committee  
for Diversity, Equity & Inclusion would also work to seek out other partners for the  
future distribution of the Opioid Settlement Funding.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin stated that some towns have not allocated any of the  
Opioid Settlement Funding they have received. Mayor Allyn stated as of last year that  
95% of Connecticut towns had not yet allocated even $1 of the funding.  
Councilor Saccone questioned whether there has been any discussion at the State  
level to change how the Opioid Settlement Funding could be used. Mayor Allyn  
explained that the Opioid Settlement Funding was a Federal Settlement with the  
Opioid Manufactures and Distributors, noting that it was a global legal settlement. He  
stated the scope for the use of the funding was limited; however, he stated that  
Ledyard was meeting the scope for the use of the funds.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Continued discussion regarding the status and possible changes to Capital Improvement Plan  
(CIP) and Capital Non-Recurring (CNR) Fund based on the American Rescue Act Funding  
(ARPA) and the process to approve ARPA Projects and expend ARPA Funding.  
2.  
Mayor Allyn stated all of the American Rescue Act Funding (ARPA) has been  
allocated to the various approved projects. He explained the Department Heads were  
working to get their projects completed. He stated other than a final accounting, that  
there was not going to much for the incoming Finance Committee to do regarding  
this Agenda item.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin noted the Ledyard Center Sewer Line Extension  
Project, and he explained for Phase II of the Sewer Line Extension Project the town  
originally used Undesignated Funds. However, he stated that they were able to restore  
some of those funds based on the final costs of Phase I, and Phase III. He stated all of  
the ARPA Funding has been allocated; and that there should not be any additional  
actions required.  
Councilor Ryan requested clarification regarding which government agency  
distributed the ARPA Funding. Mayor Allyn stated the ARPA Funding was  
distributed directly from the US Federal Treasury.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Continued discussion regarding upcoming potential Grant Opportunities.  
3.  
Mayor Allyn, III, stated today Public Works Director/Town Engineer Steve Masalin  
had a Meeting with Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments (SCCOG) to  
discuss  
a new Local Transportation Capital Improvement Program (LoTCIP) Grant  
Application to seek funding to replace one of the bridges located on Lantern Hill  
Road that did not have a high/good rating. He stated this was a Pre-Application  
meeting to see if the Project was eligible to receive the LoTCIP Funding. He stated if  
today’s meeting was favorable that it would save the Town about $1.2 million. He  
stated Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments (SCCOG) has $17 million  
available for eligible LoTCIP Projects. He stated that Ledyard already knows that the  
Lantern Hill Road Bridge fit their eligibility criteria to be considered for funding.  
Councilor Saccone questioned whether the Mayor reminded Mr. Masalin that the  
weight limit of the Bridge needed to be 42-tons based the weight of their Fire  
Apparatus. Mayor Allyn stated that he did convey Councilor Saccone’s  
recommendation to Mr. Masalin and he asked that both of the Lantern Hill Road  
Bridges be engineered to bear 50-tons.  
Councilor Ryan questioned whether the $1.2 million would pay for Ledyard’s share  
of the cost for the Bridge. Mayor Allyn stated the $1.2 million would pay for the total  
cost of the Lantern Hill Road Bridge, explaining that this Bridge on Lantern Hill  
Road was solely Ledyard’s responsibility. He stated the second Bridge on Lantern  
Hill Road, which was currently out of service was the bridge that was shared between  
Stonington and Ledyard. He stated the shared Bridge was being funded through the  
State Local Bridge Program.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Discussion scheduling Regular Quarterly Joint Finance Committee Meetings between the  
Town Council and Board of Education.  
4.  
The Finance Committee agreed that with upcoming November 4, 2025 General  
Election to recommend to the incoming Finance Committee Members of the Town  
Council and Board of Education to continue their Joint Finance Committee meetings;  
and to schedule a Joint Meeting shortly after the two groups were seated sometime in  
early December, 2025.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
5.  
Any Old Business proper to come before the Committee.  
None.  
IX.  
NEW BUSINESS  
MOTION to authorize the submission of a grant request to the State of Connecticut for the  
removal of foam and cleaning of the foam system for Gales Ferry Engine 21.  
1.  
MOTION to recommend the Town Council authorize the submission of a grant  
request to the State of Connecticut in the amount of $7,425 for the removal of foam  
and cleaning of the foam system for Gales Ferry Engine 21.  
Moved by Councilor Ryan, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Discussion: Gales Ferry Fire Chief Jeff Erhart provided some background stating that  
the existing Legacy Firefighting Foam has been found to have Per-and  
Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the product. He stated that changes to State  
Laws and awareness  
in industry have resulted in new ‘’Clean Foams’’ becoming the industry standard. He  
explained that the State of Connecticut has allocated funding to support Departments  
in the state, including the payment of hazardous waste contractors to remove the old  
foam and clean the foam systems in the apparatus in order to prevent and protect  
firefighters exposure and environmental exposure to PFAS.  
Chief Erhart continued by stating that Gales Ferry Engine 21 has the Legacy  
Firefighting Foam; however, he stated that they cannot use it; and they cannot dump  
the Legacy Firefighting Foam on the ground. He stated that he obtained a quote from  
one of the few Vendors (Croft) that do this type of work, and that he also confirmed  
with Jeff Morrissette, State Fire Administrator, that the quote and level of work was  
consistent with what he has been seeing from other Fire Companies have done. He  
stated that this was a reimbursement grant noting that the town would have to pay for  
the removal of the Legacy Firefighting Foam up-front and then submit a Form along  
with the invoices to the State to receive the reimbursement from the State.  
Chief Erhart stated in speaking with Ledyard Center Fire Chief Jon Mann that  
District #1 also had a Fire Engine with the Legacy Firefighting Foam. Therefore, he  
noted that the Ledyard Center Fire Department - District #1 would most likely be  
seeking authorization to also submit this Grant Application for the removal of foam  
and cleaning of the foam system from their truck.  
Councilor Saccone stated that it was his understanding that the State Grant Funding  
was running out quickly at the beginning of the fiscal year, and he questioned  
whether Chief Erhart found this to be the case. Chief Erhart stated when he talked  
with State Fire Administrator, Jeff Morrissette about the availability of the funding  
that he did not mention whether the funding was going quickly. However, he stated  
that Mr. Morrissette noted that the State Legislation was only providing funding to  
Municipalities and funding would not be distributed to independent Fire Companies  
or Tax Districts. However, he stated during their discussion, that he explained to Mr.  
Morrissette that the Gales Ferry Fire Company was a town related function, and that  
they were a town agency; and that Mr. Morrissette understood.  
Councilor Saccone stated when they put the Legacy Firefighting Foam in Engine 21  
that it cost about $300; noting that it was now going to cost $7,425 to get rid of it.  
Chief Erhart explained that once the Legacy Firefighting Foam was removed and the  
foam tank and water tank was cleaned that they would put the approved “New Foam”  
into Engine 21. He stated that the foam mixed with the water for petroleum based  
fires, such as car fires, etc.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin stated at a cost of $7,425 that they would be  
required to seek three quotes in accordance with Ordinance #200-001 (rev 1) “An  
Ordinance for Purchasing”. Mr. Erhart stated that he would work to seek additional  
quotes, noting that he would ask the State if they had a list of Vendors that does this  
type of hazardous mitigation work.  
Mr. Bonin explained that tonight’s request was only to apply for the Grant, noting  
that once the grant funding has been received they would have to appropriate the  
grant funds.  
Mayor Allyn stated that this grant was a reimbursement program, noting that the  
town would have to pay up-front to have the engine cleaned and then the State would  
reimburse the town.  
Councilor Ryan stated that this Motion was only to authorize the town to submit the  
Grant Application, noting that it does not authorize the Fire Department to spend the  
money. He questioned how critical this request was. Chief Erhart stated it was not  
time sensitive.  
The Finance Committee agreed to remove the following language “in the amount of  
$7,425” as a “Friendly Amendment” from the Motion as noted above (page 6).  
The Finance Committee asked Chief Erhart to come back when he has obtained the  
required three quotes, at which time they would authorize the funding to have the  
work done. Mayor Allyn suggested Chief Erhart try to obtain the three quotes for the  
Finance Committee’s November 5, 2025 meeting, explaining that because of the  
Holidays the Town Council typically only meets once during the months of  
November and December.  
VOTE:  
2- 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saccone and Ryan  
Buhle  
NAY:  
EXCUSED:  
MOTION to amend the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Standing Bid Waiver List to include the  
following:  
2.  
·
Freightliner/Alliance in East Hartford.  
MOTION to recommend the Town Council amend the Fiscal Year 2025/2026  
Standing Bid Waiver List to include the following Vendors:  
·
Groton Utilities for Emergency Repairs to the Ledyard Water Infrastructure  
· Freightliner/Alliance in East Hartford.  
Moved by Councilor Ryan, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Discussion:  
·
Groton Utilities for Emergency Repairs to the Ledyard Water Infrastructure  
Mayor Allyn explained that the Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) contracts  
with Groton Utilities for their water supply and delivery as well as maintenance of  
the water infrastructure. He stated when a watermain breaks that Groton Utilities  
repairs the  
waterline. He stated Groton Utilities was a subcontractor for the Town of Ledyard,  
however, repairing a watermain could be sizable work. He stated that he talked with  
WPCA Chairman Ed Lynch about what constitutes an “Emergency Repair” noting  
that if it was a watermain break that it would obviously be an Emergency Repair.  
However, he stated there were other things that might be biddable work and that they  
needed to be prepared to do that. He stated that WPCA Chairman Ed Lynch was  
going to try to define what constituted an Emergency. He stated that Groton Utilities  
was their water provider, noting that they had the equipment, manpower, and  
capability, therefore, it probably made sense for them to do a good amount of that  
work. He stated that Groton Utilities did a major watermain valve repair on a 16”  
watermain at the corner of Lorenze Parkway and Route 117 in the middle of the  
night; explaining that this repair was something that they did not have time to solicit  
bids for. However, he stated if they were going to add Groton Utilities to the  
Standing Bid Waiver List that they needed to define what constituted an  
Emergency”  
Administrative Assistant Roxanne Maher noted on September 25, 2019 the Town  
Council updated the July 13, 1994 “Procedures/Policy For Emergency Expenditures  
And Appropriations”.  
Councilor Ryan noted the Town already had a Policy in place to justify an  
Emergency”. He stated in reviewing WPCA Chairman Ed Lynch’s September 24,  
2025 email that his justification to include Groton Utilities on the Standing Bid  
Waiver List rests on the fact that Groton Utilities does their own due diligence.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin stated that Ledyard does not know what Groton  
Utilities’ “Due Diligence” is.  
Councilor Saccone stated that Groton Utilities can repair a fire hydrant within hours  
if not days. He noted when he worked at the Groton Subbase they would wait six-  
months before they even started to dig to repair a fire hydrant. He stated that Groton  
Utilities has always provided great service for the town’s Fire Departments. Mayor  
Allyn stated that Ledyard had a fire hydrant that was poorly placed on the Multi-Use  
Pathway at the intersection of Gallup Hill Road and Colonel Ledyard Highway, and  
he noted that Groton Utilities was meticulous in moving the fire hydrant across the  
street to Colonel Ledyard Highway and placed it behind the guiderail. He stated  
Groton Utilities was good at what they do, noting it was their business. Councilor  
Saccone agreed with Mayor Allyn, noting that they had to be diligent with taxpayers  
money.  
Councilor Ryan stated unless they had more information about Groton Utilities bid  
process, at this point he did not agree with adding Groton Utilities the Fiscal Year  
2025/2026 Standing Bid Waiver List.  
·
Freightliner/Alliance in East Hartford.  
Gales Ferry Fire Chief Jeff Erhart stated that Bull Dog has been the Gales Ferry Fire  
Company’s main service provider for many years and that they were already on the  
Standing Bid Waiver List. However, he stated that they have also used  
Freightliner/Alliance in the past for routine maintenance and repairs to their fire  
apparatus; along with a few other service providers. He stated that  
Freightliner/Alliance has been doing a lot of repair work on their aging tanker truck  
and other aging pieces of apparatus. Therefore, he stated that Freightliner/Alliance  
has intimate knowledge of the complexity of a couple of the Fire Company’s  
apparatus, which was a benefit to help troubleshoot problems quicker and more  
efficiently. He stated the Public Works Department also used Freightliner/Alliance  
noting that he thought at one time they were on the Standing Bid Waiver List. He  
went on to explain that because of their aging fleet that their preventative  
maintenance, routine checks, and annual inspections cost on average a few thousand  
dollars. However, he stated with the addition of any repairs the cost often exceeds the  
$5,000 threshold provided in Ordinance #200-001 Purchasing Ordinance” which  
would then require the Gales Ferry Fire Company to seek a minimum of three quotes.  
He stated although he was asking that Freightliner/Alliance be added to the Standing  
Bid Waiver List that what he was trying to do was leverage the best work for the least  
amount of money. He stated because Bull Dog was on the Standing Bid Waiver List  
that they were limited to Bull Dog. He stated because the number of mechanics for  
fire service vehicles was limited that if he had a larger list of vendors that he could  
better leverage their options for maintenance and repair work.  
Councilor Ryan stated by having multiple vendors on the Standing Bid Waiver List  
for the same purpose would basically put them back to Square One which was  
soliciting competitive bids. However, he stated for the Fire Departments and for the  
Police Department for when they have emergency repairs; that it would be good to  
have the ability to contract with them quicker.  
Councilor Ryan continued by noting Chief Erhart’s October 2, 2025 email in which  
he mentioned that the Gales Ferry Tanker was at Freightliner/Alliance in East  
Hartford; and that the bills and repairs were going to fall somewhere between $6,000  
to $10,000. Councilor Ryan questioned the original cost estimate. Chief Erhart stated  
for a number of years they were plagued by a Pump Pressure issue. He stated that  
they had a number of agencies look at the Pump Pressure issue explaining that  
sometimes they diagnosed the issue and sometimes they could not. He stated that  
they still have not been able to figure out the problem factor, noting that he thought it  
was an engineering issue in the system. He stated the last thing they have not replaced  
was the Pump Controller System, which was an electronic box, noting that the cost of  
the device was just under $5,000. He stated while the work was underway there were  
a number of other things that needed to be addressed such as the two air brake drums  
needed to be replaced because they would not pass the Department of Transportation  
(DOT) Inspection. Therefore, he stated that the costs exceeded the $5,000 threshold  
which would require them to solicit three quotes, noting that the Tanker has been  
sitting at Freightliner/Alliance for some time.  
Councilor Ryan stated the rationale noted in the request to add Freightliner/Alliance  
to the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Standing Bid Waiver List was because they were  
familiar with the Gales Ferry Fire Company’s Freightliner Trucks. Chief Erhart stated  
that Freightliner/Alliance can do on the spot emergency repairs.  
Councilor Saccone stated that the Gales Ferry Fire Company had used  
Freightliner/Alliance in years past. However, he stated the reason they stopped using  
them was because they were in Hartford and they would charge $90.00 an hour to  
have a driver bring the trucks to Hartford. Chief Erhart stated that the Gales Ferry  
Fire Company’s solution to save the cost for the driver, was to have a member from  
the Gales Ferry Fire Company drive the Truck to Hartford and then they pick up truck  
when the work has been completed.  
The Finance Committee agreed to remove Groton Utilities for Emergency Repairs to  
the Ledyard Water Infrastructure as a “Friendly Amendment” as noted above ( page  
7).  
Councilor Ryan stated once the Finance Committee received additional information  
from the Water Pollution Control Authority, as noted by the Finance Director, that  
they could  
VOTE:  
2- 0 Approved and so declared  
The Finance Committee thanked Chief Erhart for attending tonight’s meeting.  
Chief Erhart left the meeting at 5:34 p.m.  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saccone and Ryan  
Buhle  
NAY:  
EXCUSED:  
MOTION to appropriate and transfer $157,133 from Account #10188210-59300  
(Transferred Funds) to Account #22570101-58250 (BOE CNR Reserve Fund);  
3.  
In addition, appropriate $157,133 to Account #225670101-58250 (BOE CNR Reserve Fund)  
..end.  
Discussion regarding MOTION to recommend the Town Council to appropriate the  
receipt of additional Impact Aid Revenues and transfer $157,133 from Account  
#10188210-59300 (Transferred Funds) to Account #22570101-58250 (BOE CNR  
Reserve Fund);  
In addition, appropriate $157,133 to Account #225670101-58250 (BOE CNR  
Reserve Fund).  
Discussion: School Superintendent Jason Hartling stated as directed by the Town  
Council last year (February 29, 2024 letter) the Board of Education submitted a  
request dated July 29, 2025 for the $157,133 Surplus Impact Aid Revenue to be  
appropriated to their Capital Account to be used for Capital Improvement Projects.  
He noted that the Board of Education identified several Capital Improvement Projects  
and submitted their List to the Town Council. He thanked Councilor Saccone for his  
September 24, 2025 letter in which he challenged the Capital Projects the Board of  
Education identified, and he noted the Board of Education was now in a holding  
pattern.  
Councilor Saccone noted two of the Capital Projects the Board of Education  
identified in their July 29, 2025 letter were not funded through the Fiscal Year  
2025/2026 Budget. However, he stated three of the projects the Board of Education  
identified for the use of the additional Impact Aid Funding were funded in the Fiscal  
Year 2025/2026 Budget as noted below:  
· $65,000 High School Gym Ceiling Repairs (Not funded)  
· $15,000 High School Enclosed Bid nesting locations (Funded)  
· $45,000 High School Baseball Filed Renovations (Not funded)  
· $10,000 High School Sewer Piping Replacement (Funded)  
· $22,000 High School Boiler System Heating Repairs (Funded)  
School Superintendent Jason Hartling stated although the Capital Improvement Plan  
(CIP) in the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget showed that the Town Council approved  
these Board of Education Projects that theoretically the funding was supposed to  
come from the Board of Education’s Operating Budget, or from “Other”. He stated  
because the Board of Education did not have any funding in their Operating Budget  
for these Capital Projects that he found that the funding existed in the Board of  
Education’s Capital Non-Recurring Fund (CNR). He stated in order to fund these  
Projects that they would need to have an allocation; or the Board of Education would  
have to swap out other projects that were already approved. He stated there was no  
tax levy awarded to the Board of Education in the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget to  
complete the Projects listed in their July 29, 2025 request.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin noted his September 24, 2025 email to Councilor  
Saccone in which he explained the following two projects that were identified in  
Councilor Saccone’s September 24, 2025 letter to the Board of Education were not  
funded, noting that they were cut late in the budget process  
· $65,000 High School Gym Ceiling Repairs  
· $45,000 High School Baseball Filed Renovations  
Mr. Bonin stated along with his email that he also provided a letter dated February,  
29, 2024 from former Town Council Chairman Rodriguez which explained the  
application of the Board of Education’s Budget surplus to the BOE Capital Account  
as follows:  
“As been done in prior years these yearend surplus funds will be applied toward the  
tax levy needed to support the Board of Education's Capital Projects, as presented in  
your request for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Budget”.  
Mr. Hartling stated that he did not see Mr. Bonin’s September 24, 2025 email.  
Councilor Saccone noted that Mr. Mr. Bonin’s September 24, 2025 email was  
attached to the Agenda Packet on the meeting portal for tonight’s meeting and he  
read the email as follows:  
“From: Matthew Bonin <finance.director@ledyardct.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 3:17 PM  
To: Tony Saccone <tsac@ledyardct.org>  
Cc: Roxanne Maher <council@ledyardct.org>; Fred Allyn, III  
<mayor@ledyardct.org>  
Subject: RE: Additional Impact Aid Funding Request - Finance Committee letter  
dated 9/24/2025  
Good Afternoon Tony,  
As discussed - here is the backup.  
There are two projects identified in your letter that were not funded - they were cut  
late in the budget process (see attached red lined projects).  
I’ve also attached a letter from FY 24 that explains the application of the BOE  
surplus to the BOE. This is nothing new. While this letter pertains to the FY 22/23  
surplus - it’s how we treated last year’s surplus as well.  
There were $114,500 of BOE projects funded in the FY 25/26 budget. The funding  
source was the FY 24 audited surplus - NOT TAX LEVY but they are still considered  
funded. These funds were transferred to the BOE in March of 2025 with no assigned  
capital projects. The budget process assigned those projects.  
Please reach out with any questions.  
Regards,  
Matt”  
Superintendent Hartling stated that there was a fundamental misunderstanding  
between the Board of Education and the General Government. He stated the Board of  
Education’s Capital Non-Recurring Fund (CNR) was under the control of the Board  
of Education; and he explained that they allocated funding from their CNR Account  
for emergency capital projects such as the Gallup Hill School Water Heater, noting  
that the  
Board of Education does not have a Capital Sinking Fund. He stated those CNR  
Funds was not money that the Town transferred to the Board of Education. He stated  
the Board of Education already took action to transfer their Fiscal Year 2024/2025  
Year-End Balance to their Capital Non-Recurring (CNR) Account. He stated the lack  
of communication was where they were getting hung up.  
Councilor Saccone addressed Mr. Hartling’s comment that “The Board of Education  
already took action to transfer their Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Year-End Balance to  
their Capital Non-Recurring (CNR) Account”; and he noted that the Year-End  
Balance would not be available until the Annual Audit for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 has  
been completed. Finance Director Matthew Bonin stated that Councilor Saccone’s  
comment was correct. Mr. Hartling stated there was a change in the State Law that  
permitted the Board of Education “To have a Non-Lapsing Account” which was  
their Capital Non-Recurring Account (CNR). He noted at their February 28, 2024  
meeting the Town Council voted to set-up a new, stand alone, Board of Education  
Capital Fund for Non-Bonded Board of Education Capital Items to reside outside of  
the Town’s Capital Nonrecurring Fund (CNR Fund 210). He stated this Town  
Council action transferred the responsibility of the BOE CNR Fund to the Board of  
Education. He stated that this was a good conversation for a joint Finance Committee  
meeting. He stated as he and Councilor Saccone discussed on the telephone that they  
were trying to see where the Tax Levy Allocation was; noting that they were trying to  
spend money that was already transferred over to the Board of Education.  
Councilor Ryan stated during the past four budget years that he recalled the Town  
Council taking an action to transfer fund Year End Balances to the Board of  
Education’s Capital Non-Recurring Account (CNR) which was based on their  
Audited Operational Budget Surplus per the “Resolution Creating a Funding  
Mechanism for Making Annual Appropriations to a Capital Reserve Fund for the  
Board of Education” adopted on September 28, 1988. He stated during the previous  
years that he has never heard that the Board of Education could take that action  
themselves.  
Mr. Hartling explained that the Board of Education could transfer their Year-End  
Fund Balance to their Capital Non-Recurring Account (CNR) because the following  
two things happened: (1) Town Council transferred the Board of Education’s Capital  
Non-Recurring Fund from the auspices from the General Government to the Board of  
Education (2/28/2024) so now the Board of Education manages those funds through  
their actions; and (2) State Law changed permitting local Board of Educations to  
maintain a Non-Lapsing Account. He stated these two things changed the way the  
Town Council and Board of Education interacted with the Board of Education’s  
Capital Non-Recurring Account. He stated the past practice was that the Board of  
Education would present a Project and the Town Council would allocate the funds for  
the Project. However, he stated with the Board of Education’s Capital Non-Recuring  
(CNR) Account that the Board of Education now has to vote to allocate the funding  
for a Project. He stated the Board of Education did not request the Town Council  
transfer the responsibilities of BOE CNR Account to the Board of Education; and  
therefore, the Board of Education has had to adapt to the process as best they could.  
Councilor Ryan questioned the State Legislation Mr. Hartling referred to. Mr.  
Hartling stated that he would get back to Councilor Ryan with the Legislation that  
permitted Board of Educations to have Non-Lapsing Account. Councilor Ryan  
requested  
clarification regarding the process relative to the Board of Education’s Year-End  
Surplus. Finance Director Matthew Bonin explained because of the “Resolution  
Creating a Funding Mechanism for Making Annual Appropriations to a Capital  
Reserve Fund for the Board of Education” adopted on September 28, 1988; that each  
year the Board of Education’s Surplus was moved over the Board of Education’s  
Capital Non-Recurring Account. He stated it was more of a formality for the Town  
Council to vote to transfer the Board of Education’s Budget Surplus to their Capital  
Non-Recurring Account (CNR).  
Mr. Bonin continued by addressing the Town Council’s February 28, 2024 action to  
set-up a new, stand alone, Board of Education Capital Fund for Non-Bonded Board  
of Education Capital Items to reside outside of the Town’s Capital Nonrecurring  
Fund (CNR Fund 210). He explained that moving the Board of Education’s Capital  
Non-Recurring Account to the Board of Education was merely an accounting move  
so that the Board of Education’s purchase orders and invoices for capital projects did  
not fall on his plate; explaining that it was not to relinquish the oversight. Councilor  
Ryan stated that there needed to be more discussion on this. Mr. Hartling stated he  
appreciated the dialogue about removing things from the town’s plate. However, he  
stated when they move funds to be under the Board of Education that they then have  
a fiduciary responsibly to allocate them; and he explained that State Law does not  
permit the Town Council to appropriate the funds they previously sent to the Board  
of Education. Therefore, he stated that it creates a challenge, and that it was a matter  
of how they communicate so that everyone was clear on how they were moving  
forward. He stated that he did not believe there was a mechanism that says: “You can  
allocate the funds and the accounting responsibilities to the Board of Education, but  
that the Town Council could still maintain control”. He stated they could work  
together to figure this all out. Councilor Saccone stated they could discuss this  
subject during the Joint Finance Committee Meetings between the Town Council and  
Board of Education. However, he stated the item on tonight’s Agenda was the  
additional Impact Aid Funding that was received for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.  
Councilor Saccone continued by stating it was his understanding that once the Impact  
Aid Funding was received it was not required to be allocated to the Board of  
Education, because the Board of Education’s budget had been already approved.  
Superintendent Hartling stated that he did not disagree with Councilor Saccone’s  
comments, noting that it was not a State Law to do that. However, he stated that it  
has been the practice of the Town of Ledyard to use the extra Impact Aid Funds for  
the purpose of Capital Projects. He stated the town has been disciplined to do that  
because the Board of Education does not have a Sinking Fund; and they do not have a  
mechanism to fund Capital Projects, noting as they saw with the Fiscal Year  
2025/2026 Budget they cut the funding for the Board of Education’s capital items. He  
stated that he was happy to see that the Town Council increased the Impact Aid  
Revenue in the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Budget which was based on information that  
was received later in the budget process. He stated trying to get the capital projects  
completed was part of the larger picture, noting that it was not easy to do especially  
because the town was not flush with cash to do those things. He stated the Board of  
Education continues to push capital projects down the road; and that he was trying to  
figure out how to get these projects accomplished for the schools and their  
community. He stated in 2018 that it was additional Impact Aid Funding, and  
additional Education Cost Sharing (ECS) Funding that paid for the installation of the  
High School Artificial Turf Field. He stated this was the practice for the last  
nine-years and that it was within the Town Council’s preview to change that practice.  
POST MEETING NOTE: In accordance with the Resolution To Approve An  
Appropriation In The Amount of $616,163 Over The Approved $1,923,087 For The  
Ledyard High School Track And Multi-Use Field” approved on December 23, 2019  
the funding sources for the turf field were as follow:  
“That the source of funds in a combined total amount not to exceed TWO  
MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND  
FIFTY DOLLARS ($2,539,250) to finance the Ledyard High School Track and  
Multi-Use Field shall be allocated as follows: SIX HUNDRED SIXTEEN  
THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE DOLLARS ($616,163) from  
Account #22101010-59300 (Mill Rate Stabilization Fund-Transferred  
Funds) and ONE MILLION, NINE HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE  
THOUSAND, EIGHTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($1,923,087) from Account  
#10188210-59300 (General Fund Transferred Funds) providing that the  
Mayor, the Director of Finance and the Treasurer, or any two of them of the Town,  
shall certify that there are available unappropriated general fund resources in  
excess of the proposed appropriation.”  
Councilor Ryan questioned whether the Board of Education intended to use the  
anticipated un-audited $213,000 Board of Education’s Fiscal Year 2024/2025  
Surplus for Capital Projects that were not funded. Mr. Hartling stated the Board of  
Education has not made any appropriations for those $213,000 because the numbers  
were not yet final. He stated the Board of Education has been disciplined to only use  
their Year-End Budget Surplus for their approved capital projects and/or their  
approved expenditures that were above and beyond, such as the Gallup Hill School  
Hot Water Tank Replacement which cost about $35,000 -$40,000. He stated the  
Board of Education does not have the funds to swing should they have a significant  
capital project outlay or emergency. He stated this has been going on for a number of  
years, noting that in the past the Board of Education would come to the Town  
Council to access the CNR Fund. However, he stated this process has been  
eliminated because the Capital Non-Recurring Fund has been transferred over to the  
Board of Education. He noted as an example that last year the Board of Education  
budgeted $350,000 for maintenance and repairs; however, they spent over $400,000  
for emergency repairs, noting that they do not have a Sinking Fund or the resources  
for building emergencies. However, he stated this was a bigger discussion for the  
community.  
Councilor Saccone stated during the two-years he has served on the Town Council  
that what he has heard from the community was to hold the line on taxes; while their  
buildings, vehicles, and especially the school buildings were deteriorating. He stated  
that he understood what Mr. Harting was saying and that he was on the Board of  
Education’s side; however, he stated the community does not want to hear that. He  
stated the bigger conversation with the community should be that “They have to  
support $500,000 a year for capital projects, with most of those funds going to the  
schools, because they had the majority of the buildings in town”. He stated the bigger  
picture was to talk to the taxpayers, however, he commented that they do not want to  
hear it.  
Mr. Hartling stated outside the significant bond projects that the Board of Education  
has funded their capital improvements with the limited amount of budget surplus they  
have at the end of the each year; or if they received any additional Impact Aid  
funding, which was difficult to predict. He stated should the Town Council choose  
not to fund the Board of Education’s Capital Improvements with the additional  
Impact Aid Funding then they would need to look at other opportunities; and that  
this would need to be a community conversation. He stated that they could figure it  
out if they sit in a room and work together, which was all he could ask for.  
Councilor Saccone asked Mr. Hartling to submit a Prioritized List of Capital Projects  
for the use the additional $157,133 Impact Aid Funding that was received for Fiscal  
Year 2024/2025. Mr. Hartling stated that the Board of Education has discussed  
providing another list of Capital Projects for the use of the additional Impact Aid  
Funding, because there was the perception that the following projects, which the  
Board of Education submitted in their July 29, 2025 letter, were funded:  
· $15,000 High School Enclosed Bid nesting locations  
· $10,000 High School Sewer Piping Replacement  
· $22,000 High School Boiler System Heating Repairs  
Mr. Hartling stated that he would work with the Board of Education to vote on  
another set of projects for the use of the additional $157,133 Impact Aid Funding to  
submit to the Town Council.  
DISCUSSED  
RESULT:  
MOTION to appropriate $8,000 to Account #20810201-50000-24207 (Cemetery Committee  
- Grant Expense) to recognize the grant awarded by the State of Connecticut Office of Policy  
and Management entitled “Neglected Cemetery Account Grant Program”.  
4.  
Moved by Councilor Ryan, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
Discussion: Mayor Allyn, III, explained that at their February 12, 2025 meeting the  
Town Council authorized the Town to submit a Neglected Cemetery Grant in the  
amount of $5,000 through the "Municipal Certification of Resolution ~2025 Office of  
Policy and Management Neglected Cemetery Account Grant Program". He stated  
because the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) did not receive a lot of Grant  
Applications the town was notified that they would be receiving $8,000. He stated  
Cemetery Committee Chairman William Videll prepared the Grant Application;  
which included their intended use of the Grant Funding; and that he also provided a  
revised Plan to incorporate the additional $3,000. He noted the Cemetery Committee’  
Plan for the use of the funds included removing brush, fixing gravestones, repairing  
fences and a number of other maintenance items.  
Mayor Allyn went on to explain with the receipt of the $8,000 Grant funding that this  
action was to move to the funding to the Cemetery Committee Account so that they  
could start to do the work. He stated the funding needed to be fully expended by May  
18, 2026.  
Councilor Saccone questioned whether the Cemetery Committee would be doing the  
work themselves or whether they would be using contactors for the work. Mayor  
Allyn stated that the Cemetery Committee and other volunteers would be doing some  
of the work and that they would also use contractors for some of the work. He noted  
as an example that Ken Geer repairs gravestones; and that it was his understanding  
that the Cemetery Committee would hire Mr. Geer to use a polymer to glue some  
damaged gravestones back together and upright them.  
Councilor Saccone stated that Town Historian Kit Foster told him that Ledyard was  
in the Guiness Book of World Records, because they had the most cemeteries (53) in  
town; which included individual cemeteries, than any other town in the country.  
Mayor Allyn stated that Ledyard does have a lot of cemeteries, noting that there was  
one cemetery off of Pumpkin Hill Road with unmarked gravestones. He stated that  
they believe it was a Quaker Cemetery, because there were small lumps of stone in  
ground, explaining that the Quakers did not believe in having large ornate  
gravestones.  
Councilor Saccone asked the Mayor to remind the Cemetery Committee about the  
Cemetery inside the former American Styrenics Property in Gales Ferry. Mayor Allyn  
stated that American Styrenics/Dow Chemical used to meticulously take care of that  
Cemetery when they were in Gales Ferry. He went on to state that there was only one  
Cemetery in town that has not yet been adopted, which was located behind the  
Mashantucket Pequot Fire Department/Safety Facility. He stated the Mashantucket  
Pequot Tribal Nation put a road in to access the Cemetery and trimmed back trees  
noting that they did a nice job. He stated the Cemetery Committee was looking for a  
group to adopt that Cemetery. Councilor Saccone questioned who owned the  
Cemetery behind the Mashantucket Fire Department/Public Safety Facility. Mayor  
Allyn stated technically no one owned a Historic Cemetery, therefore he stated the  
Cemetery Committee was looking to find a group or organization to care for the  
Cemetery. Councilor Saccone stated he would look into the Cemetery located behind  
the Mashantucket Pequot Fire Department/Safety Facility.  
Councilor Ryan stated that the list of how the Cemetery Committee planned to use  
the original $5,000 Grant Funding was attached to the Agenda packet on the meeting  
portal. However, he stated that he did not see the addendum of how they were going  
to use the additional $3,000 Grant Funding. Mayor Allyn stated that Mr. Videll did a  
good job  
identifying how the additional $3,000 would be used. Councilor Ryan stated that it  
was great to receive additional grant funding.  
how the additional $3,000 would be used. Councilor Ryan stated that it was great to  
receive additional grant funding.  
VOTE:  
2- 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Tim Ryan  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Tony Saccone  
SECONDER:  
5.  
Any New Business proper to come before the Committee  
None.  
X.  
ADJOURNMENT  
Councilor Ryan moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Councilor Saccone  
VOTE:  
2 - 0 Approved and so declared, the meeting was adjourned at 6:02 p.m.  
Respectfully submitted,  
Anthony Saccone, Sr.  
Committee Chairman  
Finance  
Committee  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.