741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Planning & Zoning Commission  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman  
Tony Capon  
Regular Meeting  
Thursday, April 13, 2023  
6:00 PM  
Council Chambers - Hybrid Format  
I.  
CALL TO ORDER  
Chairman Capon called the Regular Meeting of the PZC to order at 6:00 PM. The meeting  
was hybrid with some attending in person and others via Zoom.  
II.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
III.  
ROLL CALL APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATES  
Staff Present: Planning Director, Juliet Hodge, Land Use Administrative Asst, Makenna  
Perry.  
Commissioner James Arwrach resigned from the PZC.  
Alternate Commission member, Jessica Cobb was appointed as a voting member for this  
meeting.  
Commissioner Marcelle Wood  
Chairman Tony Capon  
Present  
Alternate Member Thomas Baudro  
Commissioner Paul Whitescarver  
Commissioner Howard Craig  
Alternate Member Jessica Cobb  
Commissioner Gary St. Vil  
IV.  
V.  
CITIZENS PETITIONS (LIMITED TO NON-AGENDA ITEMS)  
Hillary Evans, thanked the Commission for their hard work throughout the years.  
APPROVAL OF ADDITIONS TO AND/OR CHANGES TO ORDER OF THE AGENDA  
None.  
VI.  
PRE APPLICATION OR WORKSHOP  
84 Silas Deane - General Discussion  
A.  
Peter Gardner, reviewed a conceptual plan for a possible 31-lot 8-30g subdivision on  
property located at 84 Silas Dean. He asked the Commission to give comments and input.  
Chairman Capon questioned if the applicant presented his idea to Southeastern Connecticut  
Water Authority (SCWA).  
Steve Rice, Charleston RI, explained that he spoke with the SCWA and they determined that  
the property has the ability to support 20+ houses.  
The Commission asked questions about fire hydrant placement, the topography of the  
property, the width of the proposed private road, as well as about the access.  
J. Hodge asked whether they had considered doing a Conservation or Open Space  
Subdivision instead.  
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPLICATIONS  
Application PZ#23-3 of the Town of Ledyard, 741 Colonel Ledyard Highway, Ledyard, CT  
06339 for amendments to The Town of Ledyard's Zoning Regulations, Section 8.31  
Short-Term Rentals, Hosted; and Section 2.2 Definitions (Mixed-use Commercial/Industrial)  
to add the words "or development" ; and to add Accessory Apartment to Section 6.4 Use  
Table. (No action - continued to June 8, 2023)  
A.  
The public hearing was opened at 6:21 PM.  
Planning Director Juliet Hodge presented the application. She read new exhibits into the  
record.  
JanCarlo Sarita, 8 Story Road, Salem MA, spoke in support of the application. Mr. Sarita  
is the property owner of 5 Johnie Court and reminded the Commission that the requirements  
regarding the presence of the host and/or use of surveillance equipment to monitor had to be  
the same for all STRs.(Short Term Rentals).  
Chairman Capon asked Mr. Sarita to give his opinion on the response time of a non-hosted  
STRs. Mr. Sarita answered that a 30-minute response time is reasonable.  
Carol Miello, 12 Cardinal Lane, spoke against the application. Ms. Miello expressed  
concern about camera placement within STRs, and that the homeowner should verify the  
placement and number of cameras on site. She supported the renewal requirement of the  
permit, and supported the minimum lot size requirement.  
Mark Spruance, 8 Redbrook Lane, spoke against the application. Mr. Spruance expressed  
concern about the impact of STRs on property values and does not support allowing  
commercial uses in residential zones.  
Nate Weiss, 23B Bittersweet Drive, spoke against the application. Mr. Weiss explained that  
STRs and the parties that may arise could potentially result in lawsuits.  
Eric Treaster, 10 Huntington Way, spoke against the application. Mr. Treaster gave the  
Commission two handouts. Mr. Treaster expressed concern about potential misconduct by  
STR guests and the negative impacts to abutting neighbors. Mr. Treaster believed that  
requiring a host to reside on the property would better control unwanted behavior. He  
expressed concern about the use of cameras, explaining that they could violate privacy laws  
or be easily disconnected. Mr. Treaster stated that towns are not required to allow STRs. He  
suggested changes to the existing STR Definition and Purpose and suggested that the  
Purpose include reasons why the town wants to allow STRs.  
Bob Graham, 72A Long Pond Road, spoke against the application. Mr. Graham was  
concerned about the lack of requirements for septic tank condition and capacity on properties  
to be used as STRs, as they need to be capable of supporting numerous guests. Mr. Graham  
suggested that the Commission require that the system be tested and proven that it can  
support the increased use.He supports limiting the number of STRs permits that can be  
issued.  
Pamela Bartlett, 62 Long Pond Road S, spoke against the application. She gave the  
Commission a handout named 'Stop Punishing Your Townspeople's. Ms. Bartlett believed  
that if STRs are not required to be hosted, they should be banned. Ms. Bartlett explained that  
businesses are not appropriate in residential zones. She expressed her concerns about the  
negative impact STRs would have on tourism and quality of life and the availability of  
affordable homes for families.  
Mike Cherry, 5 Whipporwhirl Dr, expressed his concerns about STR's. Mr. Cherry  
supported the minimum lot size requirement to operate an STR, and stated that STRs should  
be hosted. Mr. Cherry explained that high density residential districts cannot support STR's.  
He does not agree with the use video surveillance at STRs to ensure compliance.  
Steve Fagin, 63R Long Pond Road S, spoke in favor of requiring STRs to be physically  
hosted to prevent out of town investors from buying homes and using them as STRs. He  
believed that transient residents are not as vested in neighborhoods.  
Terri Isenburg, Chapman Lane, spoke in favor of the application. Ms. Isenburg explained  
that she owns an STR and that she uses video surveillance and has 'house rules' for her guests  
which helps to negate problems. Ms. Isenburg believes that STRs do not devalue a home.  
She indicated that long-term renters may be better, but that they can be a burden to get rid of.  
Erica Hall, 780 Lantern Hill Road, spoke against the application. Ms. Hall is the owner  
and operator of 'Abbey's Lantern Hill Inn' and explained the problems that she has had with  
controlling the behavior of guests and stopping them from violating policies - despite being  
present when the guests are present. She expressed concern about Ledyard's proximity to the  
Casinos and the higher likelihood of attracting partiers. She is in support of having a host on  
site at all times to be able to respond immediately and effectively. Ms. Hall explained that  
the burden is on neighbors to police the guests of a neighboring STR if there is no host. She  
noted that bad users can open new accounts on Air BnB and wipe their previous history  
clean. Ms. Hall does not see the benefit of STRs when considering the potential damage.  
Chairman Capon continued the public hearing for Application PZ#23-3RA to the next  
regular Planning and Zoning Meeting on May 11, 2023, at 6:00 PM.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Application PZ#23-4SUP of Gales Ferry Intermodal LLC / Heller, Heller, McCoy, 549 South  
Street, Quincy, MA 02169, for a special use permit for the construction of an industrial  
building with appurtenant facilities on a portion of the property located at 1761 Connecticut,  
Route 12, CT.  
B.  
Chairman Capon opened the public hearing at 7:40pm.  
Mr. Capon read a letter by Jake Troy of 55 Vinegar Hill Road into the record. Mr. Troy was  
not in support of the application.  
Planning Director, Juliet Hodge, identified and summarized the new exhibits received for the  
record.  
Att. Harry Heller, 736 Route, 32 Uncasville, presented the application on behalf of the  
applicant, Gales Ferry Intermodal LLC. Att. Heller identified George Andrews as the P.E for  
this project, Alan Peralt and Chase Davis as the principles of Gales Ferry Intermodal, Mike  
Cherry as the Communications Liaison, and Andrew McCoy, associate of Heller, Heller, and  
McCoy.  
Att. Heller summarized the proposal to build a 20,000 marine equipment repair facility with  
associated parking, access and outdoor lay down areas.  
George Andrews, licensed environmental professional and P.E with Loureiro Engineering,  
presented the dimensional and bulk requirements, and parking requirements. This operation  
is expected to have 10 employees. Mr. Andrews explained the change in elevations on site  
between the northern property line and the lay down area and discussed the landscaping and  
drainage systems proposed. He stated that the storm water system would reduce peak  
discharge and volume of run-off from the site. There will be hooded catch basins and  
hydro-dynamic separators that can handle 100 year storm volume. Mr. Andrews explained  
that the utilities are underground. They are currently in the application process with LLHD  
for the septic system. There is public water available from Route 12 which they will use, as  
well as connection to an existing gas line. Final stabilization will include pavement, grassed  
area, and landscaping.  
Planning Director, Juliet Hodge, presented her comments about the application. Ms. Hodge  
explained that this a strategic property for economic use, but maintaining the as much of the  
existing buffer between the project area and the residential neighborhood is important given  
the potential for full build-out of the property. She stated that she received revised plans only  
a few days before the meeting, so her review is not complete. She questioned the need for  
additional information regarding the impact to protected species and the need to identify the  
NDDB Areas on the plan. She clarified that the overall use is a mixed-use development with  
the individual uses being the existing industrial use (Styrenics) and the proposed vehicle and  
equipment repair facility. She questioned why the lay down area that the applicant said  
would be used for storage and repair of equipment used in Cashman's marine operations was  
larger than the area proposed for the actual principal use.  
The Commission asked questions about the activity and the marine maintenance that would  
be conducted on the lay down area.  
Alan Perrault, Cashman, explained that activity would include the storage of equipment such  
as crane booms and buckets, welding and other repair activity etc, but that the storage of  
aggregate and other material may be considered. Mr. Perrault gave Commissioners a  
rendering of the area of the site with the lay down area in use.  
Commissioner Baudro questioned if there would be dredging on site. Att. Heller answered  
that within this application there will not be dredging. He also challenged the Applicant's  
assertion that the property has been used industrially for the past 200 years. He showed aerial  
photos from the 1930's that showed that the property was almost entirely farmland. He also  
noted that Mt. Decator is a historical site.  
Stanley Lucus, 35 River Dr, spoke against the application. Mr. Lucus explained that he  
wants to ensure his quality of life is not negatively impacted, nor that there is any negative  
impact to the wildlife and natural resources in the neighborhood. Mr. Lucus purchased 3  
River Drive and is fixing it up. He expressed concern about potential depreciation of  
property values. He felt as though there should be a larger buffer.  
Dave Harned, River Dr, was not in support of the application. Mr. Harned presented his  
PowerPoint on behalf of Citizens Alliance for Land Use (CALU), his family, and Ms. Sacco  
who also submitted written comments. He expressed his concerns about the proximity of the  
building to the northerly property line. He expressed the need/want for compromise with the  
Cashman Group to move the building further away from the residential neighborhood.  
Phil LaPierre, 6 Point Breeze, Montville, was not in favor of the application. Mr. LaPierre  
lives across the river, and requested that the applicant consider a buffer to help reduce the  
noise.  
Joanne Kelly, 12 Thamesview Ptwy, was not in favor of the application. Ms. Kelly lives  
across the street and was concerned about the potential noise. She expressed her support for  
keeping a larger wooded perimeter and existing buffers. She explained that she wanted more  
transparency from the application and questioned if there was any contamination that needed  
to be re-mediated. Att. Harry Heller explained that both Dow Chemical and Trinseo have  
responsibility in compliance with the transfer act.  
Sam Roudebush, 63 Hurlbutt Road, appreciated the efforts to remediate the storm water  
runoff. Mr. Roudebush, advised the Commission to look at the application and project as a  
whole to fully consider all impacts. Mr. Roudebush is in favor of commercial development  
of land, but without impact to historical neighborhoods.  
Albert Oueletter, 401 Kittmauge, Montville, was not in support of the application. Mr.  
Ouelette worked at Allyn's Point / Dow in 1974 as a crane operator. For the last 10-12 years  
the location has been quiet. He noted that noise carries very well across the river. He is  
concerned about the lights that will be on during the night at the property.  
Robert Kleeman Jr, 1837 Route 12, was not in support of the application. He believes that  
the building should not be so close to the residents along the northern area of the property.  
He expressed concern about the outdoor activity would be, including the storage of  
aggregate, and the potential noise disturbance.  
Chairman Capon continued the public hearing to the next regular scheduled Planning  
and Zoning Meeting, on May 11, 2023 at 6:00 PM.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Application PZ#23-5CAM of Gales Ferry Intermodal LLC / Heller, Heller, McCoy, 549  
South Street, Quincy, MA 02169, for coastal area management approval for the construction  
of an industrial building with appurtenant facilities on a portion of the property located at  
1761 Connecticut, Route 12, CT.  
C.  
The public hearing opened at 10:09 PM.  
Att. Harry Heller, 732 Route 12, Uncasville, representing the applicant Gales Ferry  
Intermodal LLC, requested that the Commission incorporate the entire record from the  
previous public hearing for PZ#23-4SUP into the record of PZ#23-5CAM.  
Without objection, the entire record from PZ#23-4SUP was incorporated into the new public  
hearing for PZ#23-5CAM.  
Chairman Capon continued the public hearing to the next regular scheduled Planning  
and Zoning Meeting on May 11, 2023 at 6:00 PM.  
CONTINUE  
VIII. OLD BUSINESS  
RESULT:  
2023 Housing Plan  
A.  
Planning Director, Juliet Hodge, explained that the consultants and she were working with  
Commissioner Cobb on a housing plan map. She asked that the Commission identify  
Housing Opportunity Areas  
The public hearing is set for May 11, 2023 at 6:00 PM.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Application PZ#23-1 of Dieter and Gardner, Inc, PO Box 335, Gales Ferry CT, 06335 for the  
modification of a site plan located at 740 Colonel Ledyard Highway, Ledyard CT, 06339.  
B.  
The applicant withdrew the application.  
IX.  
NEW BUSINESS  
None.  
X.  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
March 9th, 2023 - Meeting Minutes  
A.  
The meeting minutes from the March 9, 2023 meeting were approved as submitted.  
XI.  
CORRESPONDENCE  
None.  
XII. REPORTS  
Planning Director Report - March/April  
A.  
Planning Director, Juliet Hodge presented her staff report. She reported that the department  
has hired a Zoning Enforcement Officer - Alex Samalot- who will start on May 1st. As he is  
not a certified ZEO, he will primarily focus on the many blight complaints that she cannot  
get to. She will continue to do plan review as Mr. Samalot trains. Ms. Hodge stated that it  
has been very busy in the office and that they have received numerous plans for New Single  
Family Homes.  
XIII. ADJOURNMENT  
Without objection, the meeting adjourned at 10:19 PM.  
_____________________  
Secretary, Marty Wood  
______________  
Date