741 Colonel Ledyard Highway  
Ledyard, Connecticut 06339  
TOWN OF LEDYARD  
Finance Committee  
Meeting Minutes  
Chairman  
Kevin J. Dombrowski  
Regular Meeting  
Wednesday, October 4, 2023  
5:00 PM  
Town Hall Annex Building - Hybrid  
Format  
WORKING DRAFT  
In -Person: Council Chambers - Town Hall Annex Building  
Join Zoom Meeting from your Computer, Smart Phone or Tablet:  
by Audio Only: Telephone: +1 646 558 8656; Meeting ID: 844 5000 1943; Passcode:  
223461  
I
CALL TO ORDER  
the Meeting was called to order by Councilor Saums at 5:00 p.m.  
at the Council Chambers Town Hall Annex Building.  
Councilor Saums welcomed all to the Hybrid Meeting. He stated for the Town  
Council Finance Committee and members of the Public who were participating via  
video conference that the remote meeting information was available on the Agenda  
that was posted on the Town’s Website - Granicus-Legistar Meeting Portal.  
II.  
ROLL CALL  
Councilor Bill Saums  
Councilor Andra Ingalls  
Councilor Tim Ryan  
Present:  
Excused:  
In addition, the following were present:  
Fred Allyn, IIMI ayor  
Matt Bonin Finance Director  
S. Naomi Rodriguez Town Councilor  
Steve MasalinPublic Works Director/Town Engineer  
Kristen Chapman Executive Assistant to the Mayor  
Roxanne Maher Administrative Assistant  
III.  
IV.  
V.  
RESIDENTS & PROPERTY OWNERS COMMENTS  
None.  
PRESENTATIONS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS  
None.  
APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
MOTION to approve the Finance Committee Special Meeting Minutes of September 20,  
2023  
APPROVED AND SO DECLARED  
Andra Ingalls  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Bill Saums  
SECONDER:  
VI.  
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT  
Finance Director’s Report  
(See VII. Financial Reports below).  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
VII. FINANCIAL REPORT  
(See VII. Financial Reports below).  
Financial Reports:  
·
·
·
Revenue Summary-Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Year End - Pre-Audit  
Expenditure Summary-Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Year End - Pre-Audit  
Fund Balance Projection - June 30, 2023  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin reviewed the attached Financial Reports, noting that  
the Unassigned Fund Balance as a Percentage of FY 2023 Expenditures was 8.12%  
Mr. Bonin stated based on his conversation with the Board of Education’s new  
Business Manager Kenneth Knight, that he did not anticipate any more changes to the  
Education’s Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget, he ran the Board of Education’s Munis  
Report. However, Mr. Bonin stated subsequent to running the Education’s Budget  
Report he found that the Board of Education added a new budgetary line that was  
coded as a Balance Sheet Account and not an Expenditure Account in Munis,  
Therefore, he stated when he ran the Education Budget Report the new budgetary  
line, which had about $41,000 in expenditures did not show up on the Report. He  
stated the Board of Education’s Fiscal Year Surplus was $217,780.  
Councilor Saums stated the Summary Sheet (noted above) that Mr. Bonin provided  
was very helpful, noting that the Munis Reports were challenging to understand. He  
stated the good news was that they would not have to use $1 million from the Mil  
Rate Stabilization Fund to balance the Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget. He stated the  
projected surplus for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 was $370,00 and the Unassigned Fund  
Balance was 5,341,475 which would bring the Town’s Fund Balance up to 8.12% of  
their Annual Expenditure Budget. He noted that per the “Fund Reserve Policy” that  
was adopted on May 23, 2018 that the town’s goal was to bring their Unassigned  
Fund Balance up to 10% . He also stated $217,780 of the total surplus would be  
appropriated to the Board of Education’s Capital Non-Recurring Account in  
accordance with the “Resolution Creating a Funding Mechanism for Making Annual  
Appropriations to a Capital Reserve Fund for the Board of Education” that was  
adopted on September 28 , 1988.  
Councilor Saums went on to comment on the attached Revenue and Expenditures  
noting that some came in higher than projected and some came in lower than  
expected:  
Councilor Saums specifically noted that the Debt Service Account had a surplus of  
$278,428 and he explained that this was because the former Finance Director used a  
different assumption for the interest and spending.  
Councilor Saums went on to note that the Budget Review Committee has been  
working to find something meaningful the town could do to reduce expenses. He  
stated because the town’s Finance Committees and Administrations have spent many  
years working to reduce expenses the Committee has not been able to finding  
anything. However, he stated the Committee to Review the Budget Process began to  
look at their Debt Service as an area potential savings. He stated although Ledyard  
was among the lowest in the State for total debt, that their current debt service  
expense was $4.1 million a year, explaining this was to pay down the cost of the  
project along with the interest costs associated to borrowing (bonding ) the money.  
He stated the only way to reduce their debt services and eliminate the need to borrow  
(bond) funding was to set-a-side funding each year for large improvement projects  
(roof replacement projects, etc.) as they were currently doing for the replacement of  
large pieces of equipment such as emergency apparatus like fire trucks and public  
works equipment. However, he stated to implement a long-term facilities  
improvement plan would require the town put more money their Capital  
Non-Recurring Account each year, which would cost the taxpayers more in te  
short-term to save money in the long-term.  
Mayor Allyn stated the town underspent the budget by about one half of one percent  
of the Town’s $64 million dollar budget, noting that they were very close to hitting  
the mark.  
Councilor Ingalls requested clarification regarding the following:  
Revenues:  
· Account #1011402-42006 (Property Tax for the Elderly) $85,000 - Councilor  
Ingalls questioned how this was Revenue reported.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin explained in years past the town received Grant  
Funding from the State for the local tax relief the town gave to the elderly who  
met the qualifications to receive some tax relief. However, he stated in more  
recent years, including Fiscal Year 2022/2023, the State has not provided funding  
to the town; and therefore, no revenue came into that account.  
Councilor Saums stated the Town adopted Ordinance #96 “ An Ordinance To  
Provide Property Tax Relief For Certain Homeowners Age Sixty-Five Or Over  
Or Permanently And Totally Disabled” on October 26, 2005 to provide a  
property tax abatement for residential property of certain homeowners age  
sixty-five or over or permanently and totally disabled under the provisions of the  
Connecticut State Statutes 12-129n. However, he stated because the town found  
that the program was not going to be sustainable that on January 10, 2007 they  
amended the Ordinance to be consistent with the annual income limit set by the  
State of Connecticut. He stated with the 2019 Ordinance Renumbering Project  
the Ordnance was now #200-005 and noted around January of each year the  
Town Council voted to adjust Appendix A “Qualifying Income Schedule” to be  
consistent with the State’s program.  
Mayor Allyn, III, provided some background explaining when the town initially  
adopted the Elderly Tax Relief Programs, it provided a higher income threshold  
than the State’s program. However, he stated after several year, the town  
anticipated the Elderly Tax Relief Programs going to cost the taxpayers about  
$350,000 a year, and would continue to increase that they found that the  
program was not going to be sustainable. Therefore, he stated that on January  
10, 2007 they amended the Ordinance to be consistent with the annual income  
limit set by the State of Connecticut. However, he noted that the State was not  
proving their support to the town.  
· Account #1011029-55246 (Risk Management) - Councilor Ingalls questioned  
the reason this account was only expended by 1.1%.  
· Account #10110209-55249 (Cyber Coverage) - Councilor Ingalls questioned  
the reason this account was only expended by 0%.  
Finance Director Matthew Bonin explained that the town was not able to  
retain the Cyber Coverage during the 202/2023. However, he stated they now  
have the coverage. Mayor Allyn, III, explained that they had to meet a number  
of requirements to obtain the Cyber Coverage. He noted the National Guard  
and others assisted the town in meeting the testing requirements, etc. He state  
the Cyber Security companies want to limit their exposure, when they issues  
the Cyber Security Policies.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
VIII. NEW BUSINESS  
Discuss adding a new Administrative Assistant position to support the Public Works  
1.  
Director/Town Engineer  
Councilor Saums stated Public Works Director-Town Engineer Steve Masalin was  
preparing for his eventual retirement. He noted in reviewing the list of the Public  
Works Director-Town Engineer’s responsibilities, which included administrative  
work, and the seven-page job description, that they needed to discuss what they were  
going to do. He stated the Public Works Department had a Superintendnet who did a  
lot many things and a Public Works Director/Town Engineer who does the rest.  
Councilor Saums stated based on all the years that he has been involved in town  
government, that he knew that Mr. Masalin puts in far more than the normal 35 - 40  
hours per week. Therefore, he stated the Mr. Masalin was suggesting the town  
consider adding an administrative position to pick-up some of the duties and in an  
effort to attract a candidate for the Public Works Director position. He commented  
that Mr. Masalin must love his job, noting all the work, detail and tracking he does  
regarding budget expenses, equipment replacement schedule, winter operations -  
snow plowing and salt use, the administration of the MS4 work, etc.  
Public Works Director-Town Engineer Steve Masalin explained the purpose of  
tonight’s discussion was to engage in a conversation about the value of adding an  
administrative assistant well enough in advance of the transition to a new Public  
Works Director. He stated he met with Mayor Allyn, III, Executive Assistant Kristen  
Chapman, and Director of Human Resources Marisa Rodriguez to talk about the  
duties of the position. He stated they discussed looking at existing staff and what  
duties they could accommodate, noting that there were many tasks that could be  
covered by an administrative assistant for efficiency and for the continuity of  
operations. He stated for many years these functions have been undertaken by the  
Director and more recently some of these duties have been assumed by the Highway  
Superintendent; however, he stated that this would not imply that this has been or  
would continue to be a suitable arrangement. He stated in addition to the tasks that  
have been directly associated with the Director’s job, that he also assumed a fuller  
burden of specific duties that were formerly handled by the Service Manager, noting  
that the position that was eliminated several years ago.  
Mr. Masalin went on to state that during the discussion Allyn, III, Executive  
Assistant Kristen Chapman, and Director of Human Resources Marisa Rodriguez, the  
bigger hole that emerged was the technical work, which included the management of  
the capital planning, and other projects/initiatives, etc. He stated that he has  
developed spreadsheets to track this type of data, however, he explained that it would  
take some time, even for someone that knew Microsoft Excel, to untangle the data  
noting that perhaps they would want to redo the spreadsheets in a simpler way. He  
stated that he had a Professional Engineer (PE) License, and he stated the town  
should have someone on-staff that had a PE License, noting that the person would not  
have to be the Public Works Director. He noted for a brief time the town had a Town  
Engineer on staff; and he stated in addition to that individual having a PE License  
that they were also able to absorb some of the work that he would have otherwise  
had to undertake in the area of Plan Reviews. He went on to explain that there were a  
number of other things that he has had to outsource to a Consulting Engineer which  
included work such as MS4 Administration - CLA Engineers, which they could  
perhaps bring back to being done in-house for a potential cost savings. However, he  
stated they would need to determine what would reasonably be expected of the next  
Public Works Director, and what the individual would be willing to undertake.  
Mr. Masalin stated that the town would need to decide how they wanted to  
restructure the duties and responsibilities and then provide staff to work through a  
transitional timeframe, to get things in-motion so that when he retired there would be  
staff that could carry forward the momentum that was currently in-place. He stated  
another Public Works Director may choose to do some things differently, stating that  
would be in their prerogative to do within the Leadership Structure. However, he  
stated that there were somethings that the new Public Works Director should have  
access to and decide whether the plan was working well or whether they wanted to do  
it differently.  
Mr. Masalin stated with Councilors Saums and Ingalls choosing not to run for  
reelection in November, 2023 that they would be stepping off the Town Council  
before he would be retiring, and therefore, they would not be part of these staffing  
decisions, noting that the decisions would be left to the members of the Town  
Council who come aboard in November, 2023 and beyond. He stated he did not have  
a retirement date in-mind at this time, noting that that although he would be at  
retirement age at the end of this calendar year, that because his wife was two-years  
younger than him that there were certain things he needed to keep in place. He stated  
that January 19, 2024 would be his thirty-year anniversary working for the town; and  
therefore, he was in the zone of transitioning toward retirement.  
Mr. Masalin went on to note during the discussion with Mayor Allyn, III, Executive  
Assistant Kristen Chapman, and Director of Human Resources Marisa Rodriguez,  
they talked about ways to begin the transition for his retirement, which included him  
being accessible in some way. He stated during the time when Preston’s Leadership  
was transitioning that he moonlighted as their Public Works Director for about  
one-year. He stated when Preston brought in a new Public Works Director that he  
worked alongside them for a while, and that he has continued to provide some  
consulting, which has lessened with time. He stated Ledyard’s Transfer Station crew  
was currently moonlighting on Saturday’s to help Preston out at their Transfer  
Station. He noted that Ledyard and Preston have been working together in various  
capacities to help the  
Councilor Saums noted the following spreadsheets that Mr. Masalin developed and  
has maintained were of significant value to the town; and that these were things that  
he thought the town would want to keep:  
· Heavy Equipment Replacement Schedule  
· Municipal Waste Management  
· MS4 Administration - Mr. Masalin stated although this work was outsourced to  
CLA Engineers, that it also required the Public Works Director to work with the  
Consultants.  
· Road Surface Management - Beta Group  
·
Winter Operations (overtime costs) salt needed for an event, road temperature  
monitor, when to plow or when to salt etc.  
· Transfer Station - Mr. Masalin commented on the Transfer Station, noting that  
Ledyard invited Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to  
preform and evaluation which identified a mound of work that needed to be done.  
He stated although OSHA had previously inspected the Transfer Station that a  
number of things that were not identified in the past, had to be changed. He stated  
they try to be pro-active in maintain the Transfer Station, however, they were not  
perfect.  
· Tree Warden - Mr. Masalin stated per state statute the Tree Warden had to be  
certified. He stated he went to school (several weeks) to become certified, but that  
the town could hire a certified Tree Warden, if the Public Works Director was not  
certified at the level required by state statute. He stated the town has developed  
relationships with Eversource and others to help them keep ahead of trees falling  
into the right-of-way or on electrical power line.  
Councilor Rodriguez requested clarification on the following:  
· When Mr. Masalin worked as Preston’s Public Works Director was he working in  
the capacity of a Consultant.  
Mr. Masalin stated that he worked as a 1099 Employee, not specifically as a  
consultant.  
· Could the Tree Warden could be a consultant.  
Mr. Masalin replied “Yes” that the town could hire a Tree Warden, providing they  
had the proper certification. He stated municipalities were required to have a  
Certified Agent”.  
· Would Mr. Masalin be willing to work as a Consultant.  
Mr. Masalin replied Yes”, noting that this was part of the discussion with Mayor  
Allyn, III, Executive Assistant Kristen Chapman, and Director of Human  
Resources Marisa Rodriguez, noting that other Department Heads have worked as  
a Consultant during transition. However, he stated that he would think that the  
town would want to do as much as they could as he was leaving, but that he  
would be available to come and help out if needed.  
Councilor Saums stated the arrangement Mr. Masalin had in Preston working as  
their Public Works Director to help them through their Leadership Transition  
appeared to have worked out well. He stated that Preston now had a good Public  
Works Director and Mr. Masalin was receiving less calls for his help. Mr.  
Masalin stated the arrangement worked out well, noting that Preston benefited  
from his 28-years of experience, guidance, and immediate recommendations. He  
stated that he gave an Official Report on his findings, noting that Preston began  
to use treated salt, went to double yellow lines on the roads, the Beta Group was  
now assessing their roads, and a number of other things. Therefore, he stated  
when they hired the new Public Works Director Jim Corely that many of the  
recommendations were already in-motion.  
Mayor Allyn, III, stated as Mr. Masalin stated they met yesterday, and that Director  
of Human Resources Marisa Rodriguez was already working to draft a job  
description, which would work its way through the approval process. He stated they  
think that some of the administrative work could be handled in-house by existing  
staff for some period of time. However, he stated during their discussion it became  
clear that everything Mr. Masalin was currently doing, outside of his regular duties,  
could be absorbed by existing staff.  
Councilor Ingalls stated that Public Works Director/Steve Masalin has always  
thought well ahead, noting that this was evident in the plans that he has brought to the  
Finance Committee, he was thorough, and he weighed options, etc. She stated that it  
was refreshing to have the level of analysis that Mr. Masalin has presented to the  
Finance Committee over the years. She stated the information Mr. Masalin provided  
to the Finance Committee was always very helpful and that she was impressed with  
his work. She stated when Mr. Masalin came to the Finance Committee that she was  
confident that the plan was a sound analysis and reasonable path forward for the  
town. She thanked Mr. Masalin for his work.  
Mr. Masalin thanked Councilor Ingalls for her comments. He stated many of  
initiatives were progressively added to role the Public Works Director position  
bit-by-bit over the years. He stated the last big piece was the Facilities Plan,  
explaining that the town now had a similar Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) like the  
Emergency Apparatus Replacement Schedule or the Public Works Heavy equipment  
Replacement Plan, for the for the maintenance of their Municipal Facilities. He stated  
this has been a team effort noting that these things would not have happened without  
the support of the Leadership and the funding.  
Councilor Saums thanked Mr. Masalin for his invaluable experience. Mr. Masalin  
stated that he would be retiring to Ledyard, and therefore, he would also like to see  
the programs that have been put in-place for the betterment of the community to  
continue going forward.  
DISCUSSED  
RESULT:  
MOTION to approve appropriations from the receipt of sales of vehicles and equipment  
through GovDeals in the total amount of $23,820.61 as follows:  
2.  
·
·
·
·
·
$415.00 to Sawmill Donations Account #20810201-54202-24202  
$13,351.00 to the Police Vehicles CNR Account #21020101-57510  
$885.00 to the Public Works Light Equipment CNR Account #21040101-57314  
$1,609.00 to the Board of Education Reserve Fund CNR Account #21070101-58250; and  
$7,560.61 to the Board of Education Ag-Science CNR Account #21070101-58261  
Moved by Councilor Ingalls, seconded by Councilor Saums  
Discussion: Councilor Saums stated the Town has moved away from using the  
former sealed Bid Process to sell surplus equipment to the GovDeals.com on-line  
auction site. He stated since using GovDeals.com that the town has received much  
more interest from buyers from all over the country and more money from the sale of  
items. He stated this motion would allocate the funding from each piece of equipment  
sold to their respective accounts to be used toward he future replaced of equipment.  
Mayor Allyn, III, stated one gentleman drove up from Coastal, North Carolina to  
pick-up the two out-board engines (Board of Education Agri-Science). He stated he  
thought that they would have received more many for the 1990’s out-board engines.  
However, he stated the Public Works Department provided a lot of information  
regarding the items they were selling where the Board of Education just lists the  
items.  
It was noted that to-date the town received $14,843.50 from the from GovDeals  
relative to the sale of these items. Upon receipt of the remaining $8,977.11 from  
GovDeals that the funds would be appropriated to their respective accounts.  
VOTE: 2 - 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Andra Ingalls  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Bill Saums  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saums and Ingalls  
Ryan  
AYE:  
EXCUSED:  
MOTION to authorize overspending Account #10110209-55245 (Insurance Deductible)  
through June 30, 2024.  
3.  
Moved by Councilor Saums, seconded by Councilor Ingalls  
Discussion: Councilor Saums stated that the town’s insurance deductibles have come  
in higher than the amount budgeted, noting that they have had a number of claims  
this year.  
Mayor’s Executive Assistant Kristen Chapman stated that the town typically  
budgeted $10,000 for their insurance deductibles, noting that last year (2021/2022)  
they had a surplus of $3,000 remaining in the account. However, she stated this year  
has been unusual, noting that they currently had three claims with $10,000  
deductibles.  
Ms. Chapman went on to explain the town had one incident occurred in June, 2023,  
which was after the Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Budget was approved, noting that this  
insurance deductible would be paid out of this year’s budget. She also noted one  
claim was a Class Action, but that she did not anticipate that they would reach the  
$10,000 deductible. She stated it was difficult to anticipate what was going to happen  
for the remainder of this year, noting that they mostly likely would have more  
incident that would occur this year.  
Councilor Saums questioned whether the town’s liability insurance included a ceiling  
similar to the health insurance, where once they reach an accumulative deductible  
that everything else was 100% covered. Ms. Chapman stated she would be meeting  
with Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency (CIRMA) who was the  
insurance provider for both the Town and Board of Education in November, 2023;  
and that she would look into Councilor Saums question.  
VOTE: 2- 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Bill Saums  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Andra Ingalls  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saums and Ingalls  
Ryan  
AYE:  
EXCUSED:  
MOTION to approve two tax refunds in the combined total amount of $19,287.46 with each  
exceeding $2,400.00 in accordance with tax collector departmental procedures.  
4.  
Good Essen - Foxwoods LLC  
Good Essen - Foxwoods LLC  
$5,882.69  
$13,404.77  
Moved by Councilor Ingalls, seconded by Councilor Saums  
Discussion: Councilor Saums stated in accordance with policies established for the  
Tax Collection Department, refunds to taxpayer exceeding $2,400 need to be  
approved by the Town Council. He explained because the restaurant filed their  
declaration late that the Tax Assessor had to file a certificate of correction, which  
resulted in a decrease in their assessment. He stated because the taxes were already  
paid that a refund has been requested.  
Councilor Saums stated tax refunds under $2,400 were approved by the Mayor.  
VOTE: 2 - 0 Approved and so declared  
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL  
Andra Ingalls  
RESULT:  
MOVER:  
Bill Saums  
SECONDER:  
2
1
Saums and Ingalls  
Ryan  
AYE:  
EXCUSED:  
Any other New Business proper to come before the Committee.  
None.  
5.  
IX.  
OLD BUSINESS  
Continued discussion regarding the status and possible changes to Capital Improvement Plan  
(CIP) and Capital Non-Recurring (CNR) Fund based on the American Rescue Act Funding  
(ARPA) and the process to approve ARPA Projects and expend ARPA Funding.  
1.  
Mayor Allyn, III, provided the following update regarding the ARPA Projects:  
· LED Message Signs - Mayor Allyn stated the sign in front of the Gales Ferry Fire  
Department on Route 12, Gales Ferry, should be in place soon, noting that they  
recently received the permit. However, he stated that the town was still waiting  
for approval from the State Department of Transportation (DOT) to use  
one-square foot of their property to install the Message Sign in Ledyard Center by  
the Town Green.  
· Solar Chargers - Mayor Allyn stated the solar chargers were being installed at the  
Erickson Park, the Winthrop Park, Upper Town Green and Lower Town Green.  
· Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations - Mayor Allyn explained that the town  
was hoping to install one Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Station in Gales Ferry  
and one in Ledyard Center at one of the parallel parking spaces on Route 117.  
However, he stated in speaking with Dollar General about installing an EV  
Station in their parking lot that they were opposed to having one at their location  
because they were concerned about the liability should a car catch fire on their  
property and burn a row of cars. Therefore, Mayor Allyn stated that he would  
continue to reach out to some of the Plaza Owners in Gales Ferry (CVS, Spiros,  
Fireside Building, or Job Lot) to discuss the town installing a Electric Vehicle  
(EV) Charging Stations at one of their locations.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Continued discussion regarding potential uses of the revenue received from Public Act  
No.21-58 “An Act Concerning Solid Waste Management” in accordance with “Resolution  
Regarding Revenues Received from Beverage Container Surcharges” adopted on June 8,  
2022.  
2.  
Councilor Saums stated he reviewed the Program that they received from the Town  
of Montville and made a number of edits to the first draft that he provided the  
Ledyard Beautification Committee and to Ms. Betsy Graham yesterday. He noted the  
following:  
· Collection Periods - Councilor Saums stated that Montville does their collection  
four-time a year. However, he stated during most of the year it was difficult to  
perform the clean-up because of the roadside vegetation, it was difficult to . He  
suggested Ledyard conduct their roadside clean-ups twice a year, once in the  
spring before the vegetation grows and once in the fall after the frost and the  
vegetation has died back, so they could see and pick up the trash and hip bottles.  
· Roads - Councilor Saums stated that Montville’s Program did not include  
Roads”, therefore, he put “Roads” into the Program. Mayor Allyn, stated that he  
would be talking with Montville Mayor Ronald McDaniel tomorrow and that he  
would ask about their Program relative to Roads”.  
· Interstate Roads - Councilor Saums suggested that Ledyard stay off of State  
Roads for now, noting that they could change this later if they decide to do so. He  
stated his reason for staying off of State Roads was because they typically have  
more and faster moving traffic. Mayor Allyn stated the Rotary Club’s  
Adopt-a-Highway included a 2-mile stretch on Route 12, Gales Ferry, which  
was a State Road. He stated they go up to the Groton town line down to the lower  
end of Fairway Drive (where Cartway used to be). He stated another group could  
pick-up from the end of Fairway Drive and head to the former Dow -Styrenics  
Property. He stated to clean up State Roads that they would have to obtain State  
approval, where safety reflective vests, put out signs and cones, etc.  
· Group Requirements - Councilor Saums stated Montville’s Program included a  
lot of requirements for the Groups who wanted to participate in the Program,  
noting that he thought that some of the requirements were off-putting. Councilor  
Ingalls stated that she agreed with Councilor Saums’ regarding the Group  
Requirements, and she specifically noted the 13-year-old age requirement. She stated  
as a Mom that she thought that she could get out there with an 8-year old to  
pick-up trash. However, she stated that for a non-profit to earn money for their  
organization that perhaps she could understand the 13-year age requirement.  
·
Mrs. Betsy Graham’s Comments - Councilor Ingalls stated that Mrs. Graham  
noted that their local Roadside Clean-up efforts in the Lantern Hill Valley  
around Long Pond were almost daily, noting that they were not going to get safety  
cones and reflective vests. Councilor Saums questioned whether Mrs. Graham  
was interested in getting some of the money from the Nip Bottle Surcharge  
Revenue the town was receiving. Councilor Ingalls stated that she did not know,  
but that she thought that Mrs. Graham’s comment was a good point to talk about.  
Councilor Saums stated that there were a lot of people in-town, who on their own,  
walked around picking roadside trash.  
· Supplies Pick-Up - Councilor Saums noted that Montville’s Program  
disseminated  
supplies, such as bags, safety cones, vests, etc. through their Public Works  
Department. However, he stated that he thought the Mayor’s Office was more  
accessible, noting the hours that Town Hall was open, and he commented that this  
could be changed if the Mayor thought there was a better pick-up location.  
Councilor Ingalls stated they had a number of things to discuss and decide on before  
Ledyard could implement a Adopt-a Highway Program to clean-up roadside trash and  
the nip bottles which included the following:  
· Roadside Trash Clean-up.  
· Nip Bottle Clean-up, and what they should do with the nip bottles.  
· Need to create a vehicle to for the non-profit organizations to access the nip  
bottle surcharge revenue.  
Councilor Ingalls went on to state that there were folks such as the Lantern Hill  
Valley residents who were only picking up the nip bottles, because they just wanted  
to get them off the road. Councilor Saums stated the Lantern Hill Valley residents  
would not be able to receive payment from the nip surcharge revenue under  
Montville’s Program because the program required them to pick-up all trash. He  
stated the roadside trash would go into black trash bags, the recyclable trash would go  
into clear plastic bags, and the nip bottles would go into specially marked bags. He  
stated the bags filled with trash would be left along the road and the non-profit  
organizations would be required to bring the bags of nip bottles to the Mayor’s Office  
to have them certified in order to be paid. However, he stated that they would have to  
have a way to certify that the road was clean when the non-profit organization was  
finished. Mayor Allyn agreed that the town would have to know that they did the job.  
Councilor Saums went on to state that Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resource  
Recovery Authority (SCRRRA) has been active in providing plastic bags and  
grabbers. Executive Assistant Kristen Chapman noted that she had space at the  
Town Hall to store the supplies needed for the non-profit organizations to pick-up for  
their Roadside Clean-up.  
Public Works Director/Town Engineer Steve Masalin stated that this year they used  
some of the nip bottle surcharge revenues to rent the streetsweeper, noting that street  
sweeping was one of the eligible uses for the funding. He stated being able to use the  
nip bottle surcharge funding off set funding that would have otherwise been spent  
out of the Town Aide Road Grant funding.  
Councilor Saums stated that they would also need to determine how much the town  
would pay the non-profit organizations for the nip bottles. Mayor Allyn noted at the  
Finance Committee’s June 21, 2023 meeting they discussed the town purchasing  
clear plastic 2-gallon zip lock bags that could hold, as an example, approximately  
100+/- nip bottles, which would have a specific value. He stated this would eliminate  
the need to count the nip bottles, or try to weigh the nip bottles, noting that some  
bottles were glass, and some were plastic, etc. Councilor Saums agreed, noting that  
they would still have to determine how much the town would pay per bag of nip  
bottles, explaining that they would have to consider how much nip bottle surcharge  
revenue the town was receiving versus how many nip bottles were being picked up  
off their roads. Mayor Allyn agreed, noting that they would have to develop a  
formula. He noted that the State was charging a 0.5 cent tax on every nip bottle which  
typically sold for about $1.00; therefore, he stated the nip bottle surcharge tax, which  
would be increasing to 0.10 cents in January, 2024; really did not impact the buyer.  
He went on to explain that the State disbursed the nip bottle surcharge revenue to the  
municipalities every six months, and he noted in one six-month span about 241,000  
nip bottles were sold in Ledyard.; which was the reason Mrs. Betsy Graham wanted  
to make an example of how the nip bottles were impacting their communities. He  
stated to put this in perspective that in talking to the City of Groton’s Mayor that  
outside of Electric Boat they have been using leaf blowers and snow shovels to clean  
up the nip bottles.  
CONTINUE  
RESULT:  
Any other Old Business proper to come before the Committee.  
None.  
3.  
X.  
ADJOURNMENT  
Councilor Ingalls moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Councilor Saums.  
VOTE: 2 - 0 Approved and so declared, the meeting was adjourned at 5:58 p.m.  
Respectfully submitted,  
William Saums  
Committee Chairman  
Finance  
Committee  
DISCLAIMER: Although we try to be timely and accurate these are not official records of the  
Town.